webassets/AmazonBookCoverRoxanneGrinageHireLyricsHow2000FederalCrimeVictimClassActionCaseStudiesInnovate11NewFederalLawsEconomyCareersEducationPublicSafetyReform.jpg

02/20/12 2,000 Federal Crime Victim Class Action Case Studies Innovate 11 New Federal Laws
02/22/12 RICO Class Claims Close In On Philly Judges Matthews Dougherty Dubow Murphy
02/20/12 11 New Federal Laws Proposed Innovate U.S. Economy Careers Education Government Reform
02/20/12 Federal Crime Victim Voters Propose 11 New Federal Laws In Best Interest Public Safety
02/20/12 Citizens Petition Removed Judge Matthews Murder Attempt Harassment of Roxanne Grinage
02/20/12 Nazario v State of Minnesota DHS debuts Federal Crime Victim Voters 11 New Federal Laws
02/20/12 Alaska Judicial Corruption Emergency with OCS Child Slaughter 11 Federal Laws Public Safety
02/20/12 Philadelphia DHS Slaughtered $1 Billion Class Action Case Study Propose 11 New Federal Law
02/20/12 Michigan Probate Lawyers with DHS CWS Kidnap For Profit Propose 11 New Federal Laws
02/18/12 Roxanne Grinage Prepare BOP contractor Whistleblower Retaliation to Charles E Samuels, Jr.
02/18/12 Roxanne Grinage Prepare Evidence Federal Bureau Prisons Director Charles E. Samuels, Jr.
02/14/12 Iviewit.Tv owner Eliot Bernstein and Montana Journalist Crystal Cox authorized republished
Roxanne Grinage's Dept of Justice OVC Grant Proposal Is Federal Crime Victim Voters Agenda
02/06/12 Sullivan/Kearney/Tate/Autry Mechanic Erick Brown Identity Theft Child Abduction Fugitives
California Families New Civil Rights Heroes
Maine Families New Civil Rights Heroes
Oregon Families New Civil Rights Heroes
Washington Families New Civil Rights Heroes
XX01/19/12 HireLyrics Posts Certified Notice Verified Claims U.S. Citizens Public Docket Database
XXFree Sign Up Join 112 Families and Growing Plan $1 Billion Lawsuit DHS Family Court
11/24/11 HireLyrics 1060 Federal Crime Victim Claimants Asks How Can We Fire Crooked Lawyers?
Virginia Families New Civil Rights Heroes
10/20/11 A New Civil Rights Movement Sees New Civil Rights Heroes...
071111 Restore Courage To Journalism Facts Remain Posted Truth for Sake of Truth In Public Record
111311 HireLyrics Trackers See FBI USDOJ Search Philly Judges Dougherty Murphy Matthews Pechkurow
071411 Pennsylvania Philadelphia $1 Billion Class Action 112th Claims Intake 4 Generations Thomas
070311 Pennsylvania, Philadelphia Massive Fraud DHS Retaliation Player Named by Bryan Jones
071511 Growing Court Reform Interest in Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory Test II (MMPI)
Buy HireLyrics Celebrate Twelve Step Recovery History Bronze Tokens & Executive Laser Engraved Pens
Solutions for Child Slaughter U.S. Economy Fraud Court and Educaton Reform Public Safety Emergency
The evolution of prototype demonstration of an U.S. Economy Recovery Solutions Tool

webassets/HireLyricsRoxanneGrinageCompiledDeliciousBooksPromisedEliotBernstinIviewitFightForTheGrailSECFBIComplaint.gif

DMCA Copyright Owned and Counterclaimed by Roxanne Grinage manager HireLyrics Administrative Services U.S. Citizens Public Docket Database, Pennsylvania and U.S. Department of Treasury registered standard access litigation referral having verified due diligence reported herein.  All internet radio domain and video hosts are notified of Roxanne Grinage's COUNTERCLAIM WILLINGNESS TO ACCEPT SERVICE IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA AT BUSINESS ADDRESS, P.O. BOX 22225, PHILADELPHIA PA, 19136 Tel. 267-444-0594 Fax is 215-405-2939

Christine Anderson - New York Courts Whistleblower

Christine C Anderson New York Senate Judiciary Committee Testimony Sen John Sampson 2

Senate Judiciary Committee Public Hearing 06/08/09 Part 1 of 2

Proskauer Rose LLP WIPO Decision Crystal L Cox Blogger Part 2

01/09/2011 Eliot Bernstein, Iviewit Inventor Presidential Campaign Part 1 - 5

Eliot Bernstein Iviewit Inventor 2012 Presidential Campaign Speech 2

Campaign Agendas Lawmaker Reform Special Prosecutors See Pro Se Federal Crime Victim Voters

02/09/12 Roxanne Grinage 40 min Teaching Segment: Citizens Public Docket Achieves President SOTU Dept Justice Senate CPS Economy Court Reform

Print

11/11/11 Roxanne Grinage HireLyrics respectfully suggested administrative solutions Build This Schematics Iviewit Technologies Fight For The Grail Births EIBCSB Estate Heirs Community Generational Career Paths Growing.pdf

Proskauer Rose LLP WIPO Decision Crystal L Cox Blogger - Part 1
Crystal Cox uses sponsor dollars independent Citizens Journalism opportunities afforded by collaborative powers of internet technologies to give a voice to many groups of similarly situated victims including Iviewit authentic inventors founders and shareholders.

Listen Radio Host Dave Miller Think Out Loud Discuss Oregon Federal Judge Questionable Opinion and Order 2.5 Million Defamation Awarded to Oregon Business Man because Montana Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox Utilized Sponsor Dollars Free Citizens Journalism to Restore Courage to Journalism.mp3

 
     
Print

Eliot Bernstein Estate Births Career Paths Growin
webassets/110911RoxanneGrinageDesignMarketingPanelEIBCSBEstateHeirsCareerPathsPatentRicoClaims.gif
Iviewit Investigations Peoples Party Fair Voting Devine Constitution

Eliot Bernstein Iviewit Inventor 2012 Presidential Campaign Speech 2

Free download Released October 14 2011 Eleven Pages Transcript YouTube Channel EliotBernstein Video Presentation October 14, 2011 announced People's Party (internet participation) Devine Constitution Presidential Campaign Vision of Eliot Ivan Bernstein Inventor Webcast Iviewit Technologies.pdf

101411 Listen to audio of EliotBernstein YouTube Channel Posted Video Presentation1hr 48min People's Party (internet participated) Devine Constitution Presidential Campaign Vision Eliot Ivan Bernstein Inventor Webcast Iviewit Technologies - Remember Federal Crime Victims are a tragically far too large Voter Constituency whose endorsement and impeachment clout can be organized to Leverage Individual Accountability for Official Corruption Fraud Civil Rights Violations - The more than 1020 American Working Class Student and Impoverished Federal Crime Victim Claimants Verified by HireLyrics Administrative Services Endorses Presidential Campaign Vision of Eliot Ivan Berstein - People's Party (internet participated) Devine Constitution as a Viable solutions for societal and family preservation - Respectfully Ezekiel and Arriyel's Grandma Roxanne Grinage .wma

Iviewit Blogosphere

Digital Video and Imaging Patent Pending Technologies

« IBM accused of WAR CRIMES in APARTHIED LAWSUIT before Hon. Shira A. Scheindlin of the US District Court - Southern District NY. IBM also a named Defendant in Iviewit Inventor Eliot I. Bernstein’s Federal 12 Trillion RICO patent theft lawsuit. Have they disclosed all this to IBM Shareholders???

Eliot Bernstein of Iviewit Technologies files SEC & FBI Complaint with Mary Schapiro & Others against Warner Bros., AOL Inc., Time Warner, Intel, SGI, Lockheed Martin, Proskauer Rose, Foley & Lardner »

Iviewit & Eliot I. Bernstein Official Formal Complaint sent by Official SEC Email and Official Email Addresses to Other Investigatory Agencies and Committees addressed herein, Against Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc., AOL Inc. and Time Warner, regarding Trillion Dollar alleged fraud on Shareholders; FASB No. 5 and other SEC, accounting violations and Violations of State, Federal and International Laws; Rescissory rights of Shareholders; Evidence and Important Information for the SEC regarding ongoing SEC Investigations of Bernard L. Madoff, Marc S. Dreier, Sir Robert Allen Stanford, Proskauer Rose, Galleon, Enron Broadband, Enron, Arthur Andersen and more.

I eyeball31VIEWeyeball31IT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Surf with Vision

FOR A COLOR SIGNED FINGERPRINTED FILED COPY CLICK ME - FOR HYPERACTIVE VERSION READ ON

Eliot I. Bernstein

Founder & Inventor
Direct Dial: (561) 245-8588 (o)
(561) 886-7628 (c)

Friday, February 12, 2010
OFFICIAL COMPLAINT Addressed to all of the following parties:
SEC, Chairperson Mary Shapiro @ CHAIRMANOFFICE@sec.gov and enforcement@sec.gov,
SEC, Office of Chief Accountant @ enforcement@sec.gov,
SEC, Office of International Affairs @ enforcement@sec.gov,
SEC, Office of International Enforcement Assistance @ enforcement@sec.gov,
SEC, Division of Enforcement @ enforcement@sec.gov,
SEC, Office of Internet Enforcement @ enforcement@sec.gov,
SEC, Division of Corporate Finance @ enforcement@sec.gov,
SEC, Division of Corporate Finance Chief Accountant’s Office ( CF-OCA ) @ , enforcement@sec.gov
SEC INSPECTOR GENERAL, H. David Kotz @ oig@sec.gov
INSPECTOR GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Glenn Fine @ glenn.a.fine@usdoj.gov & oig.hotline@usdoj.gov ,
Federal Bureau of Investigation – White Collar Crime Unit and all other appropriate divisions @ Miami@ic.fbi.gov ,
HOUSE AND SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEES @ john.conyers@mail.house.gov ,
NEW YORK SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE @ members’ individual email addresses,
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, Eric Holder, Jr., @ inspector.general@usdoj.gov & AskDOJ@usdoj.gov
Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration, David Gouvaia @ Complaints@tigta.treas.gov and david.gouvaia@tigta.treas.gov
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION INSPECTOR GENERAL, Peggy E. Gustafson & Daniel J. O’Rourke @ daniel.o’rourke@sba.gov & http://web.sba.gov/oigcss/client/dsp_welcome.cfm

Complaint Form
US DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE INSPECTOR GENERAL, Todd J. Zinser @ hotline@oig.doc.gov
Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the US Patent Office, David Kappos @ david.kappos@USPTO.gov
Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Deputy Director of the USPTO, Sharon Barner @ Sharon.Barner@USPTO.gov
US PATENT OFFICE - OFFICE OF ENROLLMENT AND DISCIPLINE DIRECTOR, Harry I. Moatz @ Harry.Moatz@USPTO.GOV
UNITED STATES OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT, The Honorable President of the United States Barack Obama @ Facsimile +1 (202) 456-2461

This FORMAL OFFICIAL COMPLAINT is filed with the Official SEC Complaint Intake Email Address: enforcement@sec.gov & CHAIRMANOFFICE@sec.gov and also filed with all investigators or committees the letter is addressed to, please make this Formal Complaint a part of all ongoing investigations or committees’ records regarding Iviewit companies and Eliot I, Bernstein, Inventor.

Re:         Official Formal Complaint sent by Official SEC Email and Official Email Addresses to Other Investigatory Agencies and Committees addressed herein, Against Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc., AOL Inc. and Time Warner, regarding Trillion Dollar alleged fraud on Shareholders; FASB No. 5 and other SEC, accounting violations and Violations of State, Federal and International Laws; Rescissory rights of Shareholders; Evidence and Important Information for the SEC regarding ongoing SEC Investigations of Bernard L. Madoff, Marc S. Dreier, Allen Stanford, Proskauer Rose, Galleon Enron Broadband, Enron, Arthur Andersen, and more.

Complaint filed against, including but not limited to;

Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc.
Chairman and CEO: Barry M. Meyer; Pres+ident and COO: Alan F. Horn; EVP and CFO: Edward A. Romano; Vice President and Chief Patent Counsel: Wayne M. Smith

AOL, Inc.
Chairman and CEO: Tim Armstrong; General Counsel and Executive Vice President, Corporate Development: Ira Parker; Assistant General Counsel - Patent Litigation, Prosecution, and Licensing: Christopher Day; Executive Escalation Team: Jerry McKinley

Time Warner, Inc.
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer: Jeffrey L. Bewkes; Executive Vice President and General Counsel of Time Warner Inc.: Paul T. Cappuccio

* For a more complete list of complained of parties herein from these companies, see Exhibit 1.

Conflict of interest disclosure form – please read and accept prior to further handling of this complaint. The form is listed as exhibit 2.

FAILURE TO COMPLY MAY RESULT IN FEDERAL AND STATE CRIMINAL AND CIVIL CHARGES AGAINST YOU!

INTRODUCTION – BACKGROUND INFO

I, Eliot Bernstein, of 2753 NW 34th Street, Boca Raton, Florida 33434, as one of the Original Owners and Inventors of revolutionary “backbone technologies” that transformed digital video and imaging, am filing this FORMAL COMPLAINT with the SEC and all agencies and committees addressed herein, against Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc., AOL Inc., Time Warner, Inc. and Time Warner Cable, whereby these companies and all of their subsidiaries, affiliates, contractors, agents and employees collectively are referred to herein as (“Warner Bros et al.”). Please note that these companies previously were under the same corporate structure during most, if not all, of the critically relevant times to this complaint. This timeframe includes both the original merger of Warner Bros et al. to the recent breakup of Warner Bros et al. and the allegations levied herein may have directly, and illegally, influenced those transactions to the detriment of Shareholders. Future detrimental effects on Shareholders, if failure to investigate these matters is not instant, may result in causing further massive losses to Shareholders of these highly traded New York Stock Exchange companies. The losses could be thousands of times greater than the Ponzi Schemes of Stanford, Madoff and Dreier combined and those schemes evidenced herein have ties to the alleged crimes described herein.

For your convenience, I have attached the following link to a Press Statement issued about the Merger of Warner Bros et al. back in 2000.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aol

and

http://www.timewarner.com/corp/newsroom/pr/0,20812,667602,00.html

In addition, I make a special note concerning the urgency and Time Sensitive nature of these matters predicated upon various factors, including but not limited to, the recent corporate split of AOL Inc. and Time Warner, Inc., which itself should be fully and completely investigated by the SEC as part of this complaint with direct correlation to the matters herein, for all of the reasons set forth herein. The Investigation should, include but not be limited to, all original stock and securities related transactions in the original Warner Bros et al. merger and all transactions forward. All of these transactions dating back to 1998 may have been influenced by the alleged fraud and involvement in criminal activity described herein.

                Leading Industry Experts working inside Warner Bros et al. (See attached Exhibit 1 – List of Warner Bros et al. contacts) and related companies, tested, used, viewed, approved, validated, Contracted and Licensed

February 15, 2001 ~ Signed Licensing Contract –

my technologies under multiple Non Disclosures and other Licensing Agreements. Attached hereto are various Internal communications within Warner Bros et al. documenting the relationship and admitted uses, including an ADMISSION by technologists within the organization, that my Technologies were being infringed upon AFTER NDA’s had been executed. These agreements then resulted in a Signed and Executed Licensing Agreement at that time as illustrated and exhibited herein. Warner Bros et al. and others complained of herein may be perpetrating Massive Fraud on their Shareholders through concealment of these Massive Liabilities resulting from the theft and unauthorized uses of my technologies over almost a decade.

The technologies have revolutionized digital imaging and video hardware and software and instantly heralded by leading experts in 1998 as the “Holy Grail” of the Internet that allows quality video and imaging as now used worldwide by almost every user of a PC. But broader than merely the Internet the technologies are used on virtually every camera, video camera, television, medical imaging device, telescope, microscope, satellite, DVD, graphics chip, gaming hardware and software, flight and space simulators, etc. and paved the way for new markets entirely, such as cell phone video and Voice Over Internet Protocol (“VOIP”).

Then it was discovered that our Intellectual Property Attorneys from Proskauer Rose LLP (“Proskauer”), Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley”) and Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolfe & Schlissel LLP (“Meltzer”) with the help of early licensors of my technologies, including Intel Corporation (“Intel”), Lockheed Martin (“Lockheed”), Silicon Graphics Inc. (“SGI” ), Warner Bros., AOL, IBM and more, tried to grab the “Grail”. When caught, as evidenced herein, these powerful law firms and blue chip companies resorted to terrorist styled attacks on the key inventor, including a Car Bombing and Death threats.

As I have attempted to pursue my rights and report their crimes, they have further resorted to a litany of cover up crimes in the courts and at regulatory agencies and again they were caught violating law and public offices over the last nine years in efforts to stave off prosecution for their crimes. All of these offenses are subject to multiple ongoing State, Federal and International investigations and a Twelve 12 Twelve, 12 Trillion Dollar Federal RICO and ANTITRUST Lawsuit.

May 09, 2008 Federal RICO 12 Count 12 Trillion Dollar Lawsuit Amended Complaint @

 

. The Federal RICO and ANTITRUST Lawsuit has been marked legally “RELATED” to a Federal Whistleblower Lawsuit of a New York Supreme Court Staff Attorney, discussed herein in under the section Titled “Discussion of Ongoing Lawsuits and Related Cases to Federal Whistleblower Lawsuit of Christine C. Anderson” . Sony, Intel, Lockheed, IBM, Silicon Graphics and others are also complained of herein and all authorities this complaint is addressed too should investigate all those Defendants in my Amended Complaint exhibited herein, many for similar and identical crimes.

Time Sensitive Urgency to this Complaint; POTENTIAL Catastrophic Effects to the Shareholders of Warner Bros et al.; Fraud could Trigger Rescissory Shareholder Rights

To further establish the urgency and Time Sensitive nature of this FORMAL COMPLAINT, please note that the criminal fraud and other crimes described herein will likely trigger Rescissory Rights of Shareholders at all of the respective and related companies of Warner Bros et al., which likely will have Catastrophic impact on both the companies and its Shareholders. Therefore, the SEC must instantly investigate these matters and instantly bring the matters to the attention of the Warner Bros et al. Shareholders, Auditors, Financial Institutions and all other parties with potential liabilities resulting from the allegations herein and whereby if the companies and their Executives fail to notify Shareholders and Regulators, the SEC must act quickly to notify them. The SEC must begin immediate investigation of the Securities Frauds described herein and prevent ongoing and future fraudulent corporate transactions from further harming Shareholders of Warner Bros et al.

Further, I point out to the SEC herein what looks like a recent pattern of Shareholder Fraud and Deceit done with Scienter, beginning on or about March 2009, by Officers, Directors, Counsel and Auditors for Warner Bros et al., which are alleged to have been done in order to commit further fraud upon the Warner Bros et al. Shareholders. That these recent corporate restructurings may be the result of Key Executives of Warner Bros et al. attempting to abscond with corporate assets through a series of recent complex corporate breakups. The breakups began immediately after I contacted Warner Bros. in March 2009 with my business consultant Kevin Hall, Esq. (“Hall”), regarding massive unreported liabilities to their Shareholders

A similar alleged corporate restructuring through the Bankruptcy court was done by SGI several days after notice of liabilities almost identical to those described herein and is discussed in more detail in the section titled “IVIEWIT SEC COMPLAINT FILED AGAINST INTEL, LOCKHEED MARTIN AND SGI”

Liabilities resulting from Warner Bros et. al’s involvement in my Twelve Count Twelve Trillion Dollar Federal RICO and ANTITRUST Lawsuit and additional liabilities resulting from the knowing infringement of my Intellectual Properties and for their failure to report these liabilities under FASB No.5 and other laws.

This Formal Complaint for Investigation of Warner Bros et al. on this day, Friday, February 12, 2010comes after Hall and I made repeated Good Faith attempts since March 2009 to address the Business and Corporate Responsibility issues with Executives, Officers, Board Members and Auditors at the respective companies. Warner Bros et al. was contacted in order to find possible solutions to avoid catastrophic events from occurring to their Shareholders, if possible, prior to further actions with investigators, including the SEC.

The following timeline of events will establish the correlations between the allegations of fraud described herein, in relation to the timing of the corporate restructurings of Warner Bros et al. Correlations in time with both the 2001 merger and now in the 2009 breakup with the frauds described herein, will provide the SEC a basis, mired in factual evidence, to begin immediate investigation of this complaint for massive securities fraud, in order to protect Shareholders from further possible related losses in these highly traded blue chip stocks.

TIMELINE OF WARNER BROS ET AL. RELATIONSHIP WITH IVIEWIT

                The following Timelines are presented to give a factual timeline to the allegations herein, the exhibits are linked online and all Uniform Resource Locators (“URL”) and Exhibited Links throughout this document are hereby incorporated, in entirety by reference herein, including over 1000 evidentiary links on the homepage at www.iviewit.tv with exhibits that contain thousands of pages of factual evidence.

All Agencies addressed herein, should print all exhibits referenced herein, as the Whistleblower case of Anderson points to Official Document Destruction and Tampering of Evidence.

The timeline will also reveal facts regarding the relationships between many of the Defendants in my Federal RICO and ANTITRUST Lawsuit and Warner Bros et al., including relations to the main perpetrator of the alleged crimes, the law firm Proskauer Rose.

*Note Warner Bros et al. relevant mergers, acquisitions and breakups to these matters in the timeline below are in bold italics.

1998-2002 Relevant Communications Between Iviewit and Warner Bros et al.

· 1998-2001 Inventions in Imaging and Video Discovered and Intellectual Property Filings begin in 1998. Proskauer Rose was retained Intellectual Property counsel for Iviewit for filing of Intellectual Properties.

· 2000-2002Warner Bros et al. signs multiple Iviewit Non Disclosure Agreements.

Non-Disclosure Agreements @

Pages 1-5, 10, 61-62, 80, 108-109, 234

· November 02, 2000 ~ Letter to GS regarding Warner Bros. Technological Calls to Iviewit Investors by Warner Bros. employees, describing the efficacy of the Inventions and the results of the review by Warner Bros., including the anticipated uses by Warner Bros et al.

· January 11, 2001     ~ America Online and Time Warner Complete Merger to Create AOL Time Warner

AOL PRESS RELEASE COMPLETED MERGER WITH TIME WARNER

· February 08, 2001 ~ Letter from David J. Colter (“Colter”) ~ Vice President Technology - Technological Operations Warner Bros. to Founder of AOL, Ted Leonsis (“Leonsis”), regarding the efficacy of the Iviewit technologies.

http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20010208%20Colter%20to%20Leonsis%20Warner%20Bros%20AOL.pdf

· February 15, 2001 EFFECTIVE DATE - Signed Warner Bros. License And Service Agreement

· August 15, 2001       Irell & Manella LLP Bills for Services for Warner Bros et al. and Sony Licensing Agreements

 

o It is imperative for the SEC to note that after the Signed Licensing and Service Agreement, Iviewit opened a California Office inside a Warner Bros. building, in order to take over encoding operations for their online content, and more. Iviewit began billing according to the Licensing and Service agreement. Please note the language in the Licensing and Service agreement pertaining to the Proprietary nature and Confidentiality of the Iviewit inventions.

Suddenly, after the agreements were signed and operations were underway, Wayne M. Smith ~ Vice President and Chief Patent Counsel at Warner Bros. began seeking a re-review of Proskauer Partner Kenneth Rubenstein’s (“Rubenstein”) prior patent opinions regarding the Iviewit inventions to Warner Bros. employees. Smith then claimed to Colter that he found problems while reviewing Rubenstein’s opinion with the patents on file at the US Patent Office.

It should be noted here that the US Patent Office upon reviewing the patents found enough evidence of FRAUD UPON THE UNITED STATES PATENT & TRADEMARK OFFICE to OFFICIALLY SUSPEND THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES FILED BY PROSKAUER, FOLEY AND MELTZER, while INVESTIGATIONS of the LAWYERS involved is ONGOING, including Proskauer, Foley, Meltzer, Rubenstein and Joao, as further described and exhibited later herein.

At this point, allegedly, a coordinated conspiratorial effort between Smith, Rubenstein and others began to derail the already signed Iviewit agreements with Warner Bros et al.

Allegedly, former “Acting CEO” of Iviewit, P. Stephen Lamont, (a referral emanating from AOL’s Leonsis) Smith and Rubenstein then worked to derail the Licensing and Service Agreement. Warner Bros. then further attempted to deny the existence of this BINDING CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATION as further evidenced in letters exhibited herein, whereby the Signed and Binding agreement is wholly denied. The amount owed in service fees since the signing of the contracts would be an enormous amount over the almost 10 years of use and where Warner Bros et al. have never notified Iviewit they were cancelling such contract, it may still be considered effective. Yet, it would difficult to cancel what one tries to deny the existence of and perhaps the reason no cancellation was formally completed.

o The emails forward from this point in the timeline begin to attempt to hide from the fact that Licensing and Service Agreements were already in place while also hiding these facts and liabilities from Shareholders and Auditors. The alleged fraud may again have catastrophic effect on these highly traded stocks, reaching back to this point in time and possibly further back.

 

 

· May 25, 2001 Letters to and from Douglas Chey (“Chey”), Senior Vice President of Technology for Sony Pictures Digital Entertainment and Divisional CIO, Motion Pictures and Television Productions of Sony Pictures Entertainment. Chey, formerly with Warner Bros. was working with Iviewit at Sony (also under Signed Agreements) together with Warner to do a Five Studio Movie Download Project, Movielink, where the Iviewit inventions were to be the backbone enabling technologies to make digital download and streaming possible as a commercial endeavor. Since that time, Warner Bros et al. and Sony have both done similar digital downloading projects, in violation of Signed Agreements with Iviewit.

DOUGLAS CHEY BIO

o The SEC should also begin FORMAL INVESTIGATION of Sony’s involvement in these matters. Similar calls to those described herein to Warner Bros et al. for sound business discussions to attempt to alleviate shareholder liabilities have gone wholly ignored by Sony’s In House Counsel, Executives and Auditors. I will be filing a more formal complaint shortly with the SEC but this should not delay immediate investigation by the SEC, in order to preclude Massive Liabilities to Shareholders of Sony. The SEC and all other investigators and committees addressed herein, can take this Formal Complaint additionally as a FORMAL COMPLAINT AGAINST SONY.

· December 20, 2001 ~ Lamont letter to Rubenstein regarding Smith and Rubenstein and the refusal of Rubenstein to RE-OPINE to Smith due to what he claims is a “CONFLICT”, which led further to the breakdown of relations between Iviewit and Warner Bros et al. Lamont later affirmed to Shareholders in a written communication that Microsoft had planted him in the Iviewit companies. Later Lamont changed that story to AOL and Leonsis’ niece had planted him in Iviewit through AOL Founder Leonsis’ best friend Chuck Brunelas (“Brunelas”). Brunelas recruited under contract Lamont to the Iviewit companies on behalf of Leonsis. Lamont’s revelations of being a plant at the company, which came after he was hired, led to the termination of Lamont at that time.

March 11, 2005 Lamont Termination Letter

December 20, 2001 Lamont Letters to Rubenstein ~ Pages 455-462

November 09, 2001 ~ Brunelas Employment Agreement

o Based on new information since that time, it is alleged that Rubenstein, Lamont, Leonsis and Smith operated together to sabotage Iviewit/Warner Bros et al. relations and others, purposefully to breach the prior signed licensing agreements and avoid paying the royalties owed to the Iviewit companies, using the old “good guy / bad guy” routine.

o The SEC should note here that Hall and I recently reported Lamont to Federal and State authorities for alleged collusion in the RICO and ANTITRUST activities claimed in my Federal RICO and ANTITRUST Lawsuit, including ongoing criminal activities.

Also learned since that time, is that P. Stephen Lamont may have had prior fraudulent securities related problems at his former employer Digital Factory, not disclosed in his resume submitted by Brunelas.

Further, Lamont continues to represent himself and Iviewit Shareholders as the Iviewit CEO, when he is fully aware of his termination from employment and that he has no authorization from the Board of Directors, Management or Shareholders to represent their security interests in Iviewit companies, this securities fraud also should be subject for investigation by the SEC.

o Lamont claims to be CEO of Iviewit Technologies, Inc. in multiple correspondences and Federal court papers with an address at 175 King Street, Armonk, N.Y. 10504. To the best of my knowledge, no Iviewit office is authorized or incorporated at this address or in the state of New York. The office is directly across the street from Defendant in my Federal RICO and ANTITRUST Lawsuit IBM’s world headquarters.

o Additional Evidence for the SEC regarding Lamont is contained in a June 18, 2009 Letter to New York Attorney General Chief of Staff, Steven M. Cohen regarding fraudulent activities of Lamont

o The SEC should note here that Lamont’s initial resume submitted by Iviewit contracted employment recruiter, Brunelas, is materially different and contradicts what Lamont himself recently claims regarding his past on the Iviewit Homepage, in multiple court filings and other letters to Iviewit shareholders.

§ Original 2001 Resume Submitted to Iviewit on P. Stephen Lamont by Brunelas

§ 2001 Resume Claims the following:

Columbia University School of Law ~ J. D. in Commercial and Regulatory Law - May 1992

Columbia University Graduate School of Business ~ M.B.A. in Finance and Accounting - May 1981

State University of New York at Cortland ~ B.A. in Economics - June 1978

§ 2009 Iviewit Homepage Statement written by P. Stephen Lamont claims:

“By way of introduction, I am P. Stephen Lamont, former Acting CEO of Iviewit (counsel advised all Iviewit executives to resign their posts and work along side Iviewit rather than within Iviewit, as the former Board of Directors, Counsel and Accountants, disbanded without requisite notice to Shareholders in violation of law, thereby leaving massive liability and exposure) and a significant shareholder in Iviewit. With more than a fifteen year track record as a multimedia technology and consumer electronics licensing executive and holder of a J.D. in Intellectual Property Law from Columbia University, an M.B.A in Finance, and a B.S. in Industrial Engineering” Source www.iviewit.tv homepage.

Whereby Lamont’s legal and other degrees claimed are wholly different and therefore false in one or both of his background accounts as they are materially different, again causation for further investigation of Lamont by the SEC and other investigators this letter has been copied or addressed to.

Further, you will note that Lamont refers to himself as “former Acting CEO of Iviewit” and claims counsel advised him to resign any official role due to the potential for charges of fraud, and I advised Lamont to follow counsels’ advice and personally, I did not accept any official roles on counsels’ advice. Yet, even in recent court documents and other illegally signed documents executed by Lamont to major Blue Chip companies, including Microsoft, Lamont now represents himself as CEO of Iviewit opposite of counsels’ advice, at an address that is not registered to any company Lamont claims to be employed as CEO by.

August 05, 2009 Lamont Letter to Microsoft

 

§ Lamont further now claims such executive role in my Federal RICO and ANTITRUST Lawsuit, claiming he is CEO of Iviewit, when no Board has ever put him in that position and when he is fully cognizant that he has no authority legally to represent Iviewit Shareholders. Lamont even attempts to represent Iviewit Shareholders and Companies currently in Federal Court, while not having ever passed the bar to practice law and therefore precluding him from representing others in court. Again, cause for further investigation of Lamont.

February 09, 2009 Lamont Court Filing

The SEC should note here that while the document claims service on February 09, 2008, it appears executed February 09, 2009. Whereby the SEC should also note that Lamont does not represent himself individually in the Lawsuit but instead only acts on behalf of Iviewit Shareholders, of which he has no authorization from Iviewit Shareholders or any Iviewit Board of Directors to act on their behalf.

Finally, at the company Digital Factory that Lamont lists as one of his former employers, in his resume previously exhibited herein, one of the company employees later disclosed that Lamont had been in stock trouble for securities fraud with the board of that company, of course Lamont’s resume failed to disclose this material fact.

· December 31, 2001 – Letter from Brunelas to Greg B. Thagard (“Thagard”) ~ Vice President Advanced Technology Technical Operations at Warner Bros. The letter is regarding Thagard’s acceptance of an Iviewit Advisory Board Position. Later both Thagard and Colter would receive Iviewit Stock options for their Board roles with approval of Warner Bros. and Sony executives.

 

· January 07, 2002 ~ Letters by Lamont regarding his meeting with Rubenstein regarding Warner Bros et al. Rubenstein presented the exhibited document in draft form at his deposition, read it at the deposition and then dodged questions regarding why his name is referenced in relation to opinions he gave to Warner Bros et al. after denying he knew anything about Iviewit or the patents. The letter wholly contradicts his prior denial of knowing of the Iviewit inventions or Eliot Bernstein, contradicting his sworn deposition statements and sworn letters to Judge Jorge Labarga, constituting multiple instances of perjury and more.

January 07, 2002 Lamont letters to Rubenstein

Pages 19-23

November 20, 2002 Rubenstein Deposition and Deposition Exhibits

Pages 1-100, the exhibits attached to the deposition of Rubenstein show Rubenstein’s denials to the court of knowledge of Iviewit and even claiming he was being harassed, as he knew nothing, which in deposition his statements become clear as wholly perjurious.

· January 14, 2002          Warner Bros. employee Colter’s internal Warner Bros. document containing an Admission of Use of Iviewit Proprietary Processes and Violation of NON-DISCLOSURE agreements by many Warner Bros et al. employees. The letter also provides affirmation that Rubenstein (MPEGLA LLC Patent Counsel, former Iviewit Proskauer Rose Patent Counsel, Warner Bros. counsel and Iviewit Shareholder) opined favorably to Warner Bros. The document again directly refutes Rubenstein’s statements in deposition and written communications to the Labarga court that he did not opine or even know of the Iviewit inventions.

 

· February 17, 2002 – Eliot Bernstein letter to Brunelas regarding Smith’s sudden request to have Rubenstein of Proskauer speak to him to re-opine on his former statements, already exhibited herein, regarding the efficacy and novelty of the patents. Rubenstein was acting Patent Counsel to Iviewit as indicated in the exhibited Wachovia Private Placement Memorandum that Proskauer billed to author and distribute to Iviewit potential investors. The links below provide information on Rubenstein’s position as an Iviewit Board member and Iviewit Patent Counsel despite his statements to the contrary. At the time Smith requested to speak with Rubenstein to restate his opinions, Iviewit already terminated Proskauer and Rubenstein and investigations were already underway regarding the patent thefts and more.

February 17, 2002 Letter from Eliot Bernstein to Brunelas.

January 2001 Wachovia Private Placement Memorandum, whereby the SEC should note here that Rubenstein is listed both as Iviewit Patent Counsel and an Iviewit Advisory Board member.

Page 4 – “Company has retained Foley & Lardner to shepherd its patent development and procurement. In addition, the Company has retained Kenneth Rubenstein of Proskauer Rose, LLP to oversee its entire patent portfolio - Mr. Rubenstein is the head of the MPEG-2 patent pool.

Page 16 - “Strong and Experienced Board of Directors and Advisory Board.” iviewit’s Board of Directors and Advisors consist of several well-established individuals from the technology, entertainment, and financial community. Directors have extensive backgrounds with top-tier firms such as Goldman Sachs, Kidder Peabody, and McKinsey & Co. Crossbow Ventures has provided $3.0 million in funding and sits on the Board. Technology and entertainment guidance comes from a partner at Armstrong Hirsch Jackoway & Wertheimer and from Kenneth Rubenstein, the head of the MPEG-2 patent pool.

Additionally on Page 16 - “The Company has retained Foley & Lardner to shepherd its patent development and procurement. In addition, the Company has retained Kenneth Rubenstein of Proskauer Rose, LLP to oversee its entire patent portfolio. The Company’s strategy is to establish market precedence through licensing of trade secrets and know-how.

Page 38 – ADVISORY BOARD SECTION “Kenneth Rubenstein Partner, Proskauer Rose LLP. Mr. Rubenstein is a partner at Proskauer Rose LLP law firm and is the patent attorney for iviewit. He is a registered patent attorney before the US. Patent & Trademark Office. Mr. Rubenstein counsels his clients with respect to the validity and infringement of competitors’ patents, as well as prosecutes patent applications. For the past several years he has worked on the formation of a patent pool, for MPEG-2 technology, involving large consumer electronics and entertainment companies. He is also a former member of the legal staff at Bell Laboratories. Mr. Rubenstein received his law degree, cum laude, from New York Law School and his Ph.D. in physics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology where he also graduated with a B.S. Degree.

o The SEC should note here that Rubenstein’s attempt to claim he never heard of Iviewit, including at his deposition, allegedly is due to the massive conflicts of interest that Rubenstein had. If Rubenstein were patent counsel to Iviewit and simultaneously counsel to Warner Bros et al. when he originally opined to Colter, without conflict waivers or disclosure, this obviously would have violated attorney conduct codes and law. Additionally, a false statement in a Private Placement Memorandum violates securities laws.

Additionally, Rubenstein is conflicted with Iviewit his client and the patent pooling scheme and artifice to fraud inventors he has created, MPEGLA LLC, where again he acted as counsel and founder of MPEGLA LLC while also patent counsel to Iviewit, no conflict waivers were gained to protect Iviewit. The conflict here is again obvious where the Iviewit technologies were the single greatest threat to his pools as Iviewit has the dominant technology, which without, the MPEG license would be worthless. The SEC should note that Rubenstein initially misrepresented himself and Joao as Proskauer Partners to Iviewit, when prior to learning of my inventions they were both with Meltzer. Rubenstein is counsel and sole patent evaluator for MPEGLA LLC now one of the largest infringers of the Iviewit technologies, licensing Warner Bros et al. and thousands of others.

Proskauer, after learning of my technologies value, estimated at a trillion dollars to “priceless” by leading engineers at Real 3D, Inc. and without a patent department at the time in 1998, then rushed to acquire Rubenstein and his Meltzer patent group and control and monetization of the MPEGLA LLC pools. When the acquisition was complete, Proskauer, my former patent counsel, directly began inuring benefits from the stolen technologies via their new client MPEGLA LLC in their new Intellectual Property department created after learning of my inventions now headed by Rubenstein and other Meltzer partners.

MPEGLA has now tied and bundled my inventions to their pools licensing schemes, converting the royalties from the technologies from Iviewit and through other anticompetitive tactics have kept Iviewit from market in classic RICO and ANTITRUST violations, including violations of Sherman and Clayton, as further defined in my Federal RICO and ANTITRUST Lawsuit exhibited already herein.

o The SEC should note here that Warner Bros et al. and many of those involved directly in these matters are also involved in DVD patent pooling schemes, including but not limited to, DVD6C Patent Pool.

http://www.dvd6cla.com/offer_080904_New.html “On behalf of the DVD6C Licensing Group (DVD6C), we are pleased to offer your company a portfolio license that covers essential patents for certain DVD formats and +R/+RW Disc formats. The members of DVD6C — Hitachi Ltd., Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd (Panasonic), Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Sanyo Electric Co., Ltd., Sharp Corporation, Toshiba Corporation, Victor Company of Japan, Ltd. (JVC) and Warner Bros. Home Entertainment Inc. — collectively own hundreds of essential patents for these DVD formats and +R/+RW Disc formats.”

o Whereby, similar to MPEGLA LLC’s illegal use of my technologies, DVD6C has similarly tied and bundled my technologies to their pools licenses, excluding me from royalties and then inuring royalties from others from my technologies directly from their membership position in the pool.

o The SEC should note that the only Meltzer Intellectual Property attorney not to transfer to Proskauer at the time of acquisition was a one Raymond Joao, who initially with Rubenstein was represented as a Proskauer partner and who took initial patent disclosures with Rubenstein. In 1999-2000, based on early evidence surfacing, Joao allegedly was putting patents into his own name while sabotaging the Iviewit patents. Upon leaving Iviewit, Joao claimed publically that he had 90+ patents in his name and then went to work for Marc S. Dreier, recently prosecuted and convicted by the SEC for an alleged Ponzi scheme, as further evidenced and discussed later herein.

· February 08, 2002 – Lamont letter to John D. Calkins (“Calkins”) ~ Senior Vice President New Media Business Development of Warner Bros., regarding stock issued to Warner Bros. employees Colter and Thagard for Advisory Board roles they accepted and also regarding their about face and breach of contracts.

 

· February 20, 2002 – Calkins Letter to Lamont denying IP infringement and contract violations in utter denial of the facts and evidence, including the Signed License and Service Agreement, Signed NDA’s, letters from Warner Bros. employees citing violations of the NDA’s and more, already presented herein. The SEC should note that opposite of Calkins’ claims in the letter that Iviewit is creating a false record; it is instead Calkins and Smith attempting to create a false and misleading record of fact in the letter opposite of the facts.

 

· February 27, 2002 – Lamont to Calkins about Warner Bros. Breach of Contracts, the SEC should note that while Lamont relies on the NDA, the February 15, 2001 SIGNED LICENSING AGREEMENT, illustrated above, also has strong language about IP rights concerning the Iviewit technologies that also are violated. Also, take note that at this time in 2002, Warner Bros et al. knew of the breaches and formally were notified by Iviewit at that time of such breaches, therefore they should have begun accounting for and disclosing the IP Liabilities at this time in their accounting reports, if not earlier according to FASB accounting rules.

 

· March 05, 2002 – Smith letter to Lamont denying IP infringement and contract violations in utter denial of the facts and evidence, including the Signed License and Service Agreement, Signed NDA’s, letters from Warner Bros. employees citing violations of the NDA’s and more, already presented herein.

· November 20, 2002 - April 15, 2002 Letter by Lamont to Rubenstein Regarding Conversations with Warner Bros et al. presented to Rubenstein at his November 20, 2002 Deposition as already discussed herein.

Pages 3-9

o Please note that the correspondence exhibited above refers to a notification issued to Warner Bros. at that time, which provided Warner Bros et al. further notice at that time that Cease and Desist letters and threatened litigation would be forthcoming regarding the technology infringements. Warner Bros et al. already was given notice of Breach of Contracts regarding the Intellectual Properties in prior communiqués exhibited and these letters certainly cite specific liabilities Warner was aware of going forward.

Liabilities exist for Warner Bros et al. for their involvement in the alleged criminal RICO and ANTITRUST activities initially discovered from information partially uncovered by Warner Bros et al. in 2001, as they were on the verge of investing $25 Million Dollars of capital to my companies. When doing their due diligence on a $12 Million Dollar Private Placement with Wachovia Securities, corporate and intellectual property frauds were uncovered, including discoveries by Smith regarding the Proskauer/Rubenstein/Joao filed patents and Calkins discovered initial evidence of corporate and bankruptcy frauds. At that time, Warner Bros et al. counsel, including Smith, employees and personnel became aware of frauds relating to both the patents filed with the US Patent Office and additional corporate fraud, additional information regarding similar corporate frauds was also being unearthed at that time in an audit being conducted by Arthur Andersen (“Andersen”) which will be discussed further herein. This information of what Smith and Calkin’s had discovered was relayed to Iviewit by Colter on behalf of both Smith and Calkins as rational for not going forward on the Private Placement investment.

Colter relayed that Warner Bros et al. uncovered fraud, including fraudulent statements made by Proskauer Rose and Foley & Lardner, former Iviewit counsel, regarding statements made in the Wachovia Private Placement whereby the bankruptcy and lawsuits were not disclosed that were later discovered. The Private Placement Memorandum completed by, billed for and circulated to potential Iviewit investors, including Warner Bros et al., by Proskauer. The Fraudulent statements by counsel and others contained in the Wachovia Private Placement, distributed for capital investment is cause for further SEC investigations of these criminal and SEC violations. Further questions arise as to Wachovia’s actions once they too were aware of the Fraud.

Per Colter, Warner Bros et al. and Smith uncovered Intellectual Property Frauds involving fraudulent oaths to the US Patent Office and Worldwide Patent Authorities, which has in part led to suspension of my Intellectual Properties by the US Patent Commissioner pending investigations by the US Patent Office and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. This series of events led to further uncovering Patent Fraud by my former counsel Proskauer, Foley and Meltzer and others that are subject to several state, federal and international ongoing investigations and legal actions.

Investigations now include one by Harry I. Moatz (“Moatz”), Director of the United States Patent & Trademark Office – Office of Enrollment and Discipline (“OED”), charged with oversight of the Federal Patent Bar and patent attorney criminal issues. Moatz confirmed that W. Palm Beach FBI Special Agent, Stephen Lucchesi had joined his investigation of FRAUD ON THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE allegedly committed by attorneys registered with the Federal Patent Bar.

Moatz also directed me to file claims of Fraud on the USPTO with the Commissioner of the US Patent Office that resulted in the exhibited herein patent suspensions. Moatz assembled a team of Patent Office Officials to aid me in getting the Intellectual Properties ready for suspension while investigations proceeded, as he removed all prior counsel from access to the IP. Amazingly, the patent office initial information which led to suspension proved that materially false information on the patents was not only given to the US Patent Office but that similar false information was given by Proskauer, Foley and Meltzer to Wachovia Securities for inclusion into the Private Placement Memorandum.

Per Colter, Calkin’s had found fraud involving a fraudulent billing lawsuit against the Iviewit companies by counsel Proskauer. Prior to Calkin’s information Iviewit corporate officers, directors and management did not know about such lawsuit, except those now charged with the RICO and ANTITRUST crimes and therefore it was not disclosed by Proskauer or Iviewit Accountants to Wachovia Securities for their due diligence and therefore not reflected in the Private Placement, further false statements in a securities document. At the time, I retained independent counsel, Caroline Prochotska Rogers, Esquire to investigate the corporate and patent fraud allegations and it was confirmed that there was a bankruptcy filing and lawsuit that were not disclosed to Wachovia or Iviewit’s Board and Management that were not part of the conspiratorial efforts.

It was later learned that the companies sued by Proskauer were companies fraudulently set up by former counsel Proskauer and had stolen Intellectual Properties in them, this was learned from information discovered directly from the US Patent Office OED Investigations. Whereby, Arthur Andersen on or about this time, while auditing the Iviewit companies for the largest investor Crossbow Ventures of West Palm Beach Florida, whose investment funds were two-thirds SBA SBIC funds, found identical and similarly named companies to the Iviewit companies. The Fraud involving the stolen Small Business Administration Funds is under ongoing investigation with the SBA Inspector General’s office, the SEC through actions involving the Boca Raton Police Department (“Boca PD”) to be discussed in detail herein and other investigators.

Per Colter, Smith discovered Fraud involving Kenneth Rubenstein, a Proskauer Rose law firm partner and sole patent evaluator for one of the largest infringers and criminal suspects in my Federal RICO and ANTITRUST Lawsuit and this was the supposed reason he want Rubenstein to re-opine. The SEC should note here that in addition to the US Patent Office OED investigation of Rubenstein, Rubenstein also is under investigation with other attorneys, including Joao, all ordered for investigation by unanimous consent of Five Justices of the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department.

Investigations ordered for “Conflicts of Interest and the Appearance of Impropriety” when a Proskauer partner, Steven C. Krane, violated public office rules at the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department – Departmental Disciplinary Committee. Krane caught handling Iviewit/Proskauer complaints, in order to block the complaints against his partner Rubenstein and his firm Proskauer, concealing the massive conflict he had as an Officer of the First Department Disciplinary Committee and other conflicts from other ethical public office positions he maintains in New York, while remaining a Proskauer partner.

After discovery of the alleged Intellectual Property fraudulent filings, Iviewit learned later that Smith, IP counsel for Warner Bros., was now working with Rubenstein who was Iviewit’s former IP counsel, MPEGLA counsel and Warner Bros. counsel. Whereby, upon Smith’s request for Rubenstein to re-opine, Rubenstein claimed he was conflicted with Warner Bros. et al. and Iviewit and therefore could not opine, including even to reiterate his prior opinion, as already evidenced herein. Whereby Warner Bros. et al. then breached their contracts and began illegally using and licensing the technologies to others in violation of the Binding Signed Agreements. The DVD6C, MPEGLA LLC and other patent pooling schemes, where Warner Bros. and Proskauer are major participants, for example in the DVD6C pool which are managed and monetized by Warner Bros., Proskauer and Rubenstein. The pooling schemes are alleged to be merely artifices to STEAL INVENTIONS FROM INVENTORS in violation of multiple Antitrust laws and have illegally precluded me from market in classic RICO and ANTITRUST activities, including death threats and a car bomb.

“The Authoritative Blu-ray Disc (BD) FAQ: X. Copying Deterrents, Content Protection, and Intellectual Property” by Hugh Bennett - August 28, 2006 EMediaLive @

 

“On Oct. 20, 2009, One-Blue, LLC issued a call for patents with their essentiality to BD products sold in the United States to be evaluated by Proskauer, Rose LLP (an international law firm that performs similar determinations for MPEG LA, DVD6C and 4C). An initial meeting of essential patent holders is planned for Nov. 6, 2009 in Japan. However, it is far from clear how successful this effort will be with respect to its ultimate participants as well as the scope and terms of any possibly consensual programs.”

and

“Seeking to avoid the complexities of DVD’s multi-agent system (DVD6C, 4C, 3C, 1C, etc.), MPEG LA began working in 2005 with BD’s multiple stakeholders to establish itself a one-stop essential Blu-ray patent licensing authority. Those who participated in this effort included: CyberLink, Dell, Disney, Hewlett-Packard, Hitachi, Philips Electronics, LG Electronics, Mitsubishi, Panasonic, Pioneer, Samsung, Sanyo, Sharp, Sonic Solutions, Sony, TDK, Victor Company of Japan (JVC) and Warner Home Video.”

The Patent Pooling Schemes that Warner Bros. is directly involved in and inuring benefit from are also using the technologies in violation of Signed and Binding Contracts and Licensing Agreements, admittedly. Yet, since that time Warner Bros. have also excluded Iviewit from market tying and bundling the technologies in their licensing schemes, again in classic RICO and ANTITRUST activities and not only failed to pay Iviewit royalties but have failed to account for the 10 years of knowing infringement and the Massive Liabilities to Shareholders that mounts daily.

2009-2010 Recent Communications with Warner Bros et al.

The SEC should note that while there is a long gap in time between the prior Iviewit and Warner Bros et al. communications and contracts, that during the gap I was nevertheless actively pursuing my rights contrary to Smith’s claim that nothing has been done. Factually, I have given similar information to several state, federal and international investigators, House and Senate Judiciary Committees, the New York Senate Judiciary Committee, many state and federal courts and more over the last several years. During the gap in time, I was also forced to flee my home several times for my family’s safety, including from death threats from Mr. Brian Utley on behalf of the law firms Proskauer Rose and Foley & Lardner and then from actual Attempted Murder of my family. Attempted Murder through a Car Bombing of my family minivan in Del Ray Beach, FL., images of the Car Bombing can be found on the www.iviewit.tv homepage.

From: Eliot Ivan Bernstein 
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2012 7:52 AM
To: The Honorable Glenn Fine - Inspector General Department of Justice, Lonnie Davis Miami Field Office; Inspector General Department of Justice; The Honorable Glenn Fine ~ Inspector General @ United States Department of Justice (____________ @usdoj.gov)

Cc: 'Michael Thomas ~ VP Consumer & Legal Affairs, General Counsel @ Volvo Cars of North America Inc. (______@volvocars.com)'; 'Stefan Jacoby ~ President and CEO @ Volvo Car Corporation (______@volvocars.com)'; 'Stefan Jacoby c/o Jeanette Rider @ Volvo Car Corporation (______@volvocars.com)'; Elisabet Wenzlaff ~ Senior Vice President and General Counsel @ Volvo Car Corporation (______@volvocars.com); Jill S. Bilanchon, Esq. ~ Vice President / Assistant General Counsel @ AutoNation, Inc. (­­­­______@autonation.com); 'Jeanette Rider c/o Renee Liden @ Volvo Car Corporation (_____@volvocars.com)'; 'Renee Liden @ Volvo Car Corporation (______@volvocars.com)'; 'Doug Speck ~ Acting Senior Vice President - Marketing, Sales and Customer Service @ Volvo Car Corporation (______@volvocars.com)'; 'Caroline Prochotska Rogers, Esquire (_______@cprogers.com)'; 'Marc R. Garber, Esquire @ Flaster Greenberg P.C.'; 'Michele M. Mulrooney Esq. - Jackoway Tyerman Wertheimer Austen Mandelbaum & Morris (________@JTWAMM.com)'; 'Andy Dietz

Subject: RE: IVIEWIT INVESTIGATION - VOLVO NOTICE OF LIABILITY for CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS and CIVIL COMPLAINTS NAMING VOLVO CORPORATION N. AMERICA/SWEDEN/AUTONATION LIABILITIES IN RICO & ANTITRUST LAWSUIT & CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS

Dear Lonnie Davis, Department of Justice, Office of the Inspector General and
the Department of Justice Intake Office,

Attached herein, in a PDF file and contained in the letter below, is information about an alleged Vehicle and Vehicle Record tampering by Marrone Volvo/Autonation/Huizenga Holdings, Volvo Cars of North America and Volvo of Sweden, which may have been a further attempt to MURDER my family through another instance of alleged Vehicular Tampering while our car was being serviced.  Please make this communiqué part of the Ongoing Department of Justice Investigation into the Iviewit/Eliot Bernstein investigation, which also includes an attempted murder via a vehicle CAR BOMBING in Fl., while the prior minivan was in for servicing.  Of major concern is that it has only recently been learned that one of the main perpetrators in the Iviewit/Eliot Bernstein RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit and the Criminal Complaints filed with the DOJ and others, Mr. Wayne Huizenga, is intimately involved and owned the dealership, Marrone Volvo/Autonation/Huizenga Holdings, where this new Vehicle Tampering issue has occurred.  Mr. Huizenga is a CENTRAL CONSPIRATOR in my RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit and that predicate act of Attempted Murder cited in my Amended Complaint in that matter.

Another point of concern, is that once Marrone Volvo and Volvo North America were found to be tampering with Vehicle records and falsifying claims of a Certified Vehicle Inspection by a Volvo Certified Engineer regarding the safety of the vehicle, the General Counsel for Mr. Huizenga’s organization, a one Jill Bilanchone, Esq., attempted to claim that she was not conflicted in responding to these matters for her employer, Marrone Volvo/Autonation/Huizenga Holdings, despite the fact that Wayne Huizenga owns/owned Marrone Volvo/Autonation/Huizenga Holdings and was the founder and listed in the Board of Director page.  Bilanchone refused to sign a conflict of interest disclosure and acted on behalf of all the corporations knowing of her conflicts with Mr. Huizenga’s organizations, instead of retaining outside NON CONFLICTED legal counsel to respond to the matters.

After realizing my car was not only not getting serviced properly since almost day one by Marrone/Autonation/Huizenga Holdings but that Huizenga owned Marrone, I tendered several letters to both Marrone Volvo, Volvo North America and Volvo Sweden, which advised them of the criminal RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit in NY that Huizenga is a central defendant in and that Federal Judge Shira Scheindlin “legally related” my lawsuit to a New York Supreme Court Whistleblower lawsuit and that these alleged Vehicle tampering issues represented legal liabilities MarroneVolvo/Autonation/Huizenga Holdings, Volvo Cars of North America and Volvo Sweden.  Instead of having Counsel reply to the myriad of Civil and Criminal allegations against the corporations and officers and employees of the corporations, I received a call last week from Erika Kirsch, one of the main alleged perpetrators named in the documents and charged with falsifying Service Records and Vehicle Engineering Reports and despite admitting and acknowledging that she was aware of Criminal and Civil charges alleged against her in the matters and the conflict this posed in her contacting me regarding legal liabilities of the Corporations and their employees, she maintained that she was representing the legal matters for the corporations.  I am unclear if Erika, the Executive Management Specialist for Volvo Cars of North America, has legal standing to respond to these very legal matters relating to massive potential liabilities for the corporations and executives involved or if any of the corporations could not retain legal counsel due to conflicts and thus had Erika, a named party in the complaints, respond as no one else could be found to continue to perpetrate the crimes involved in covering up the matter.  I have notified all of the parties of their liabilities and that they were being criminally complained of and would be added to all ongoing and future Civil and Criminal actions relating to these matters.

Finally, Marrone Volvo/Autonation/Huizenga Holdings, Volvo North America and Volvo Sweden have refused repeated requests to provide FULL VEHICLE RECORDS to me, which I believe is mandatory under law and this again imparts something afoul.  To date, I have not received the signed Certified Engineering Report that supposedly was done and is mentioned in the attached Adobe PDF file either and the executives at Volvo, including legal counsel for both Volvo Cars of North America and Volvo Sweden, have refused to take my calls or respond, other than through Erika, to letters tendered to them and their counsel.  I have more evidence, including conversations, messages and letters regarding these matters not contained herein and will be submitting that information for your review after analysis but please take this letter as a FORMAL Criminal Complaint for this matter to be added to all my DOJ and DOJ OIG investigations ongoing.  I will be contacting you shortly to further discuss these matters.  Again, thank you for all of your time, effort and consideration of these life threatening matters regarding the Iviewit/Eliot Bernstein matters, I will be forwarding this letter to several other criminal investigators with ongoing investigations and will copy you on those.  I have copied those involved from the corporations named in the complaints as further service to them of the criminal and civil notice of liabilities in criminal and civil complaints being filed against them for reporting to their auditors, insurance carriers, bondholders, shareholders and any other party they are obligated to notice of such or any party who may incur liabilities in these matters. 

Please feel free to call me if you have questions or need additional information.  Eliot Bernstein

[Link to free download described pdf attachment coming soon].

The Greatest Patent Story Ever Told - Episode 1, The Greatest Patent Story Ever Told - Episode 2 Uploaded by YouTube Channel PSLAMONT on Apr 11, 2007 - CEO Lamont: Patent Sabotage-Theft-Seige on the USPTO and EPO - Episode 1<br>http://youtu.be/QYwg2kCMClY  and http://youtu.be/ORICTNG4sVA

Eliot Bernstein Iviewit Testimony NY Senate Judiciary Part 1 Sen John Sampson

Eliot Bernstein Iviewit Testimony NY Senate Judiciary Part 2 Sen John Sampson eliotbernstein

02132012 Republished www.HireLyrics.org peoplesparty case study page Permission www.iviewit.tv Owner Inventor Eliot Ivan Berstein 102709 Letter New York Senate Judiciary Committe Chairman Senator John L. Sampson Letter re Reardon and Friedberg Complaints

I-VIEW-IT  HOLDINGS, INC.
I-VIEW-IT  TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Eliot I. Bernstein
Founder & Inventor
Direct Dial: (561) 245-8588 (o)
                     (561) 886-7628 (c)

VIA - EMAIL

Tuesday, October 27, 2009
Senator John L. Sampson
Chairman
New York Senate Judiciary Committee
506 Legislative Office Building
Albany, New York 12247

Re:      Whistleblower Allegations of Criminal Activity at the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department Exposed in US Federal Court Requiring The Judiciary Committee’s Immediate Action & Response of Roy Reardon to the Request of Chairman, John L. Sampson Regarding Disciplinary Complaints Filed a the First Department, including but not limited to;
A. “New Complaints”

            1. Roy L. Reardon, Esq. – Waiting Docket # Since February 2009
            2. Alan W. Friedberg, Esq. – Waiting Docket # Since February 2009
B. “2008 Complaints” Matters of Attorney Complaints Docket #2008-0756, appears to attempt to merge multiple complaints into one docket number, waiting formal individual docket #’s from NYAG.
            3. Proskauer Rose, LLP – First Dep. Failed to formally docket since 2008
            4. Foley & Lardner - First Dep. Failed to formally docket since 2008
            5. Gregg M. Mashberg, Esq. - First Dep. Failed to formally docket since 2008
            6. Joanna F. Smith, Esq. - First Dep. Failed to formally docket since 2008
            7. Todd C. Norbitz, Esq. - First Dep. Failed to formally docket since 2008
            8. Anne B. Sekel, Esq. - First Dep. Failed to formally docket since 2008
C. “Old Complaints”
Unpublished First Dept. Court Orders for Investigation

            M3198 - Steven C. Krane & Proskauer Rose
            M2820 - Kenneth Rubenstein & Proskauer Rose and Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolfe and Schlissel
            M3212 Raymond A. Joao
            Transferred by Unpublished COURT Orders, by Unanimous Consent of five First Dept Justices for Conflict of Interest and the Appearance of Impropriety to the Second Department.  The Second Department failed to conduct formal investigations ordered by First Dept. and the First Dept. failed to ever follow up on their Orders)
            9.   Thomas Cahill Special Inquiry No. 2004.1122 (former 1st Dept Chief Counsel) – Ongoing investigation by Martin Gold.
            10. Steven C. Krane docket #2004.1883 (1st Dept Officer, former NYSBA President & Proskauer partner)
            11. Kenneth Rubenstein docket #2003.0531 (Proskauer partner)
            12. Raymond A. Joao docket #2003-0352
            13. Proskauer Rose, LLP - First Dep. Failed to formally docket since 2003
            14. Meltzer Lippe Goldstein & Schlissel - First Dep. failed to formally docket since 2003

Dear Chairman John L. Sampson,

I.      Introduction

I write to you as a follow up to your request to Alan W. Friedberg ( Friedberg ), Chief Counsel of the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department ( First Dept ) Departmental Disciplinary Committee ( DDC ) to provide you with status and information regarding Concealed Disciplinary Complaints at the September 24, 2009 Judiciary Committee hearing you held, as Friedberg has responded to me, instead of you.  As you may recall, at the beginning of my testimony at that hearing on Court Corruption in New York, you asked Friedberg to provide you with information regarding what happened to complaints filed against Friedberg himself and Roy L. Reardon ( Reardon ), Chairman of the DDC[1] by myself, almost 8 months earlier. 

II.      NY Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department – Departmental Disciplinary Committee Letter dated October 07, 2009 to Eliot Bernstein in response to a Request for Information by Senator John L. Sampson, Chair, NY Senate Judiciary Committee as Evidence of Further Violations of Attorney Conduct Codes, Violations of the Rules and Regulations of the DDC and Violations of Law

Senator Sampson, I was stunned to get a direct reply from Reardon on October 07, 2009 attached herein as Exhibit 1, skirting your request for information and without even a courtesy carbon copy of the letter to your office, a letter regarding what happened to CONCEALED complaints against Reardon and Friedberg.  The letter again has Reardon handling his own complaint and attempting to dismiss the complaint against himself and other DDC members, a violation of Attorney Conduct Codes, the Rules Regulating the DDC and Law in a multiplicity of ways, including the obvious conflict created by one reviewing ones own complaint and acting upon it. 

As you may remember from my testimony at the September 24, 2009 Judiciary Committee hearing, the DDC is a defendant in my Twelve Trillion Dollar Lawsuit[2] marked legally related to the Whistleblower case of Christine C. Anderson ( Anderson ) and the DDC as a defendant in that lawsuit have representative counsel, the New York Attorney General ( NYAG ).  The DDC as a named defendant in my lawsuit, which the filed complaints directly relate to, makes it inappropriate, highly unethical and illegal for the DDC to be directly contacting me or handling the complaints versus having the matters handled through their retained counsel, Monica Connell ( Connell ) of the NYAG.  As it is inappropriate for me, acting as Pro Se legal counsel, to be contacting parties directly who have counsel, I worked with DDC counsel the NYAG to have the complaints transferred to NON-CONFLICTED investigators.  Connell directed me to file the complaints with the DDC stating the complaints would be moved once filed and that no First Dept or DDC members would even review the materials due to their OBVIOUS CONFLICTS but that procedurally the complaints initially had to be filed at the DDC.  Yet, defying ethics and their counsel’s arrangements with me, the DDC interceded and attempted to dismiss the complaints against other defendants in the lawsuit and now even themselves in what defies logic, ethics and law.

More despicable is the insanity of Reardon in then attempting to handle and dismiss the complaints against himself and Friedberg in the current letter, complaints resulting from their conflicted actions dismissing the complaints against the other defendants in the same lawsuit they are defendants in; in what constitutes a CONFLICT OF INTEREST that defines the word CONFLICT.  A CONFLICT creating an APPEARANCE OF IMPROPRIETY that acts to OBSTRUCT JUSTICE and DENY DUE PROCESS, leading to a loss of faith in Judiciary System of New York[3].  The audacity of attempting to dismiss complaints against oneself is par with the course for the Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department where it has recently been exposed in the ongoing Whistleblower Federal Lawsuit of Christine C. Anderson ( Anderson ) v. The State of New York that the DDC has a “CLEANER”.  A “CLEANER” named Naomi F. Goldstein who is the Deputy Chief Counsel of the DDC, allegedly fixing disciplinary complaints for the US Attorney, the District Attorney and the Assistant District Attorney, according to sworn testimony by inside Whistleblower Anderson, a former Staff Attorney of the New York Supreme Court in the trial before the Honorable Judge Shira A. Scheindlin ( Scheindlin )[4].  In a scene more reminiscent of the Gotti trial, which simultaneously was being heard on the 26th Floor of the Federal Courthouse, the DDC trial on the 15th Floor produced allegations of a “Cleaner” fixing disciplinary complaints, in the Department Reardon and Friedberg are Senior Officers.  The highest office of the Legal System, the Regulator of the Legal Profession demanding the highest ethics, appears to be run mob style, complete with ASSAULTS on Christine Anderson, as confirmed in Scheindlin’s court.

Of course, Reardon should have responded directly to your offices as you requested him to but instead choose to ignore your request for information and sent me the attached letter instead, which now causes even more problems.  In the letter, again attempting to exculpate himself from complaints against himself that he has CONCEALED since February of 2009, Reardon continues his pattern of UNETHICAL and ILLEGAL behavior that defies ethics, continuing directly to handle complaints against him, Friedberg and other defendants.  Now attempting to deny they were aware of the complaints, although referencing the FORMAL COMPLAINT filed against them in February.  Reardon’s letter attempting to dismiss the complaints he has CONCEALED against himself since February 09, 2009[5] by saying a FORMAL COMPLAINT against him he did not feel was a complaint, defying the Rules Regulating the DDC, the Attorney Conduct Code, including but not limited to, DR (Disciplinary Rule) 1-102A 4 and 5, NY Penal Laws (see below) and Law. 

As you can see from the attached response of Reardon in Exhibit 1, he attempts now to claim that my February 09, 2009 FORMAL COMPLAINT did not constitute a complaint against himself and Friedberg.  Still they failed to respond in any way until your request, more indicative of CONCEALMENT, since Reardon now admits receiving the FORMAL COMPLAINT in February.   The denial that the letter was a FORMAL COMPLAINT coming despite direct language in the letter claiming that it was a FORMAL COMPLAINT, to provide docketing numbers and to pass the new complaints to a NON-CONFLICTED THIRD PARTY.  Yet obviously, Mr. Reardon can no longer comprehend reality, read or is attempting to set up an insanity or illiteracy defense.  In fact, Reardon claims in the attached letter,

“We checked our records and found no substantive disciplinary complaint from you against me or Mr. Friedberg filed in 2009. We do have a fax letter from you dated February 9, 2009 which, among several issues, raises questions concerning possible conflicts by Committee Staff and Members in the handling of certain complaints brought by you. We did not deem that letter to be a formal complaint against me and Mr. Friedberg.”

            My letter Reardon References of February 09, 2009[6] in fact states specifically the following,

“Mr. Reardon and Mr. Friedberg, for your conflicted responses and violation of the First Department Rules and Attorney Code of Conduct, I welcome you to the Iviewit affairs with formal New Complaints against both of you with your department and ask that those be forwarded to your counsel the NYAG to have non conflicted parties review the matters versus your highly conflicted offices. [Emphasis Added]  The New Complaints are to include anyone else in your offices or on the Committee who took part in any review and decision on the 2008 Complaints filed, as indicated in your letters.  Please provide the appropriate information regarding the members involved.”

And further in that very same February 2009 letter,

“Mssrs. Reardon & Friedberg, please take this letter as a formal complaint against both of you personally and all those who partook in these matters and please docket the New Complaints according to the established procedural rules and laws. [Emphasis Added]  Mssrs. Reardon & Friedberg, it is surprising that you are aware of the Old Complaints filed at your department dating back to on or about 2001-2005 that you mention in your letter, which were filed in your office by the Iviewit companies and me.  The Old Complaints were transferred to the Second Department as you astutely noted; however, you fail in your letter to mention that they were transferred due to a finding of the Appearance of Impropriety & Conflicts, in those attorney complaints.  In notifying authorities of your newest unethical actions and rule violations, please provide me with all of the following information so that I may formally instigate further oversight of your unlawful and unethical behavior: [Emphasis Added]

1.         List of all reviewers or employees who handled these 2008 Complaints, including all Committee members you reference in your letter,

2.         Attach complete copies of the files for each separate 2008 Complaint filed and for the Old Complaints filed in your offices,

3.         Provide individual 2008 Complaint DOCKET numbers, your letter only indicates one 2008-0756, for the following complained of parties:

a.         The Law Offices of Proskauer Rose LLP

b.         Foley & Lardner LLP

c.         Gregg M. Mashberg, Esq.

d.         Joanna F. Smith, Esq.

e.         Todd C. Norbitz

f.          Anne B. Sekel

g.         Alan W. Friedberg, Esq. (provide Special Inquiry #) [Emphasis Added]

h.         Roy Reardon, Esq. (provide Special Inquiry #) [Emphasis Added]

Rules applicable to the New Complaint against Reardon & Friedberg shall include, but not be limited to, the following...”

It would be nearly impossible for Mr. Reardon to make the claim that he did not see that this letter was a FORMAL COMPLAINT against Mr. Friedberg and himself as it could be no clearer and fully complies with complaint procedures of the DDC.  Again, although citing my February 09, 2009 COMPLAINT, Reardon fails to reckon with the fact that the COMPLAINT clearly demands that he not touch the complaints as arranged by his counsel the NYAG and yet he disregards the request to have the NYAG move the complaints due to the DDC conflict as a defendant.  Brazen, Stupid, Illiterate perhaps but any way you slice it, Reardon’s response is Conflicted and as such a Violation of his Department Rules, the Attorney Code of Conduct and Law, together causing OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE and violations of, including but not limited to, the Penal Laws cited below:

NY Penal Laws § 195.00 Official Misconduct.

    A public servant is guilty of official misconduct when, with intent to obtain a benefit or deprive another person of a benefit:

    1. He commits an act relating to his office but constituting an unauthorized exercise of his official functions, knowing that such act is unauthorized; or

    2. He knowingly refrains from performing a duty which is imposed upon him by law or is clearly inherent in the nature of his office.

 

NY Penal Law § 175.25 Tampering with public records in the first degree.

    A  person  is  guilty  of  tampering  with public records in the first degree when, knowing that he does not have the authority of anyone entitled to grant it, and with intent to defraud, he knowingly removes, mutilates, destroys, conceals, makes a false entry in or falsely alters any  record or other written instrument filed with, deposited in, or otherwise constituting a record of a public office or public servant.

    Tampering with public records in the first degree is a class D felony.

NY Penal Law § 175.20 Tampering with public records in the second degree.

    A  person  is  guilty  of  tampering with public records in the second degree when, knowing that he does not have the authority of anyone entitled to grant it, he knowingly removes, mutilates, destroys, conceals, makes a false entry in or falsely alters any record  or  other written instrument filed with, deposited in,or otherwise constituting a record of a public office or public servant.

    Tampering  with  public  records  in  the  second  degree is a Class A  misdemeanor

NY Penal Law § 175.25 Tampering with public records in the first degree.

    A  person  is  guilty  of  tampering  with public records in the first degree when, knowing that he does  not  have  the  authority  of  anyone entitled to grant it, and with intent to defraud, he knowingly removes, mutilates, destroys, conceals, makes a false entry in or falsely  alters any  record  or  other  written  instrument filed with, deposited in, or otherwise constituting a record of a public office or public servant.

    Tampering with public records in the first degree is a class D felony.

 

III.      Request for Oversight and Intervention by the NY Senate Judiciary Committee to Procure and Take Action to; Formulate Requests for the NYAG, The US Attorney and the NY District Attorney to convene Grand Juries to Investigate the Whistleblower Criminal Allegations of Whitewashing at the First Department and DDC;  Formulate Requests for the NYAG, The US Attorney and the NY District Attorney to convene Grand Juries to Investigate the Offices of the US Attorney and the NY District Attorney based on the Criminal Allegations of Whitewashing of Complaints for those Agencies in US Federal Court; Formulate Requests for the NYAG to convene a Grand Jury to Investigate the Office of the NYAG for their failure to follow Public Officer Rules and more.

Now apparent is that the NYAG and the DDC cannot refrain from violating law to cover up their prior crimes in these matters by acting in conflict after conflict, in violation of virtually all of the attorney codes of conduct, public office rules and regulations and law.  Violating the very ethical conduct, they are in charge of enforcing and upholding.  Formally through this communiqué, I request that your offices request the NYAG and District Attorney to now convene grand juries or similar regulatory bodies, to investigate and cease the mass of conflicts, cease the violations of the Rules and Regulations of the First Department and others, cease the violations of attorney conduct codes and cease the violations of law. 

I also request that the Judiciary Committee force all prior and current disciplinary complaints filed by myself at the First or Second Departments transferred to a non-conflicted third party for IMMEDIATE Investigation.  As you can see from the letter correspondences herein, DDC Public Officials already found once in these matters acting in Conflict, causing the Appearance of Impropriety and in those matters ORDERED FOR INVESTIGATION for CONFLICT OF INTEREST and THE APPEARANCE OF IMPROPRIETY.  Again, we find officers of the DDC handling complaints against themselves, a pattern that has led to voluminous complaints against the various culpable parties in that department.  Please have Mssrs: Friedberg and Reardon address your offices directly regarding these matters as requested and not myself, as again, it is only proper for me to have contact with them through their counsel, the NYAG. 

IV.      Whistleblower Federal Lawsuit Reveals Criminal Allegations of Assault, Whitewashing of Complaints for the US Attorney, District Attorney and Assistant District Attorney, Favored Law Firms and Lawyers and more Requiring Judiciary Committee Action

On a more damning note, in Federal Court, under Federal Judge Scheindlin, whom herself termed the Anderson case a “Whistleblower” lawsuit, information alleging criminal activities including Whitewashing of Complaints and Assault were levied.  Whitewashing by former DDC Chief Counsel, Thomas J. Cahill ( Cahill ), Deputy Chief Counsel Sherry K. Cohen, Deputy Chief Counsel Naomi Goldstein (AKA “The Cleaner”), former First Department Clerk of the Court Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe and others, now entered in the record via sworn testimony of Anderson in the matters.  Based on Anderson’s Whistleblowing allegations that Goldstein ILLEGALLY fixes complaints for the US Attorney, the District Attorney and the Assistant District Attorney through criminal Whitewashing and more, in turn, causing Obstruction, makes it now MANDATORY by Judicial Cannons, Public Office Rules & Regulations, Attorney Conduct Codes and Law that the appropriate authorities are formally notified and CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS in mass begin. 

All those now aware of these CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS, including Scheindlin, the NYAG that was present when the claims were made in open court, the US Attorney, the District Attorney and the Assistant District Attorney who are named by Anderson and whereby all of these officials are now all legally obligated to begin immediate criminal investigations into these most serious criminal allegations.  Investigations should include the Inspector General of the Department of Justice, the Inspector General or other such regulatory body(ies) for the New York Supreme Court, the Inspector General for the New York Attorney General and the District Attorney or any other investigatory body(ies) you may convene or summon.  As well, the Judiciary Committee was fully informed of the CRIMINAL allegations levied by Anderson in her riveting testimony before the first NY Senate Judiciary Committee you held whereby similar CRIMINAL ACTIVITY was revealed in that hearing and therefore the NY Senate Judiciary Committee has obligations to now report and or take appropriate actions having such knowledge of these CRIMES. 

The NYAG is probably a bit conflicted at this point in time to become involved due to the conflicts caused by the NYAG representing the Anderson state defendants, instead of investigating them based on the Whistleblower allegations (again as defined by Federal Judge Scheindlin) through the Public Integrity Unit charged with these investigations.  Due to the Obvious Conflict, it may be a bad idea to summon the NYAG now to investigate their current clients as this would only compound the conflicts.  The NYAG’s prior failure to initiate investigations knowing of these Whistleblower claims and instead embarking on a defense of the accused public officials, may make it more applicable to begin formal investigations of the NYAG as part of the ever-growing cover up at the highest level of the New York Courts and Prosecutorial Offices. 

NY Executive Law: § 63. General duties. The attorney-general shall:

1.      Prosecute and defend all actions and proceedings in which the state is interested, and have charge and control of all the legal business of the departments and bureaus of the state, or of any office thereof which requires the services of attorney or counsel, in order to protect the interest of the state…

 

The NYAG instead of advising their state defendant clients to get counsel due to the Conflict of Interest and Legal Obligations to Protect the Public instead has failed to do anything but put up a sham defense in Federal Court to protect the accused, failing his duties to the Public and failing,

Public Officers Rule 17 2(b)

(b) Subject to the conditions set forth in paragraph (a) of this subdivision, the employee shall be entitled to be represented by the attorney general, provided, however, that the employee shall be entitled to representation by private counsel of his choice in any civil judicial proceeding whenever the attorney general determines based upon his investigation and review of the facts and circumstances of the case that representation by the attorney general would be inappropriate, or whenever a court of competent jurisdiction, upon appropriate motion or by a special proceeding, determines that a conflict of interest exists and that the employee is entitled to be represented by private counsel of his choice.

In fact, this conflict is further insipid in that it blocks due process by blocking out investigation by criminal investigators in the Anderson matters, as the NYAG has conflicted his offices from their public obligation to investigate the public officials they represent.  This block acts to OBSTRUCT JUSTICE through CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, VIOLATIONS OF PUBLIC OFFICE RULES & REGULATIONS and LAW. 

Finally, in reviewing the rest of Mr. Reardon’s recent letter we find further insane claims such as,

“Your previous complaints against former Chief Counsel Thomas Cahill and Mr. Friedberg had been addressed in my January 27, 2009 letter to you. That letter concluded the investigation[7].” [Footnote Added]

In fact, the letter was not addressed to me at all, or even carbon copied me and instead sent to an Iviewit company at an unauthorized address.  I have no information such company exists in any form at that address and have reported this fact to the NYAG, including information regarding P. Stephen Lamont whom the letter is addressed to and whom I’ve asked the NYAG to begin investigation regarding potential securities and other frauds[8]. 

The claim by Reardon is further absurd in that the complaint against Cahill was part of the complaints transferred by the First Department for further investigation and an integral part of the complaints transferred by First Department COURT ORDER for INVESTIGATION.  Per DDC Rules, the complaint against Cahill was transferred for SPECIAL INQUIRY to Martin Gold and has been ongoing for several years and now part of the Federal RICO Complaint I filed.  The audacity of Mr. Reardon to NOW, after years, try and usurp that process in the middle of the lawsuit and dismiss the complaints against defendant Cahill again is wholly outside the Rules and Procedures of their Department and wholly unethical due to their conflicts as defendants in the lawsuit. 

In yet another absurd attempt to deny reality in his October 7, 2009 letter, Reardon attempts to diffuse the fact that my COMPLAINT of February 09, 2009 was a formal request for reconsideration of their illegal and conflicted decision to dismiss complaints against the attorneys acting in conflict before the Scheindlin court.  This denial that the dismissal was not properly appealed for reconsideration is a further attempt to try to cover up the fact that he did not follow the Rules and Regulations regarding reconsideration as he CONCEALED the factual COMPLAINT from February until your request for him to give you status.   Now Reardon claims,

“With regard to the "2008" complaints against various attorneys, our January 12, 2009 closing letter advises that you may seek reconsideration of the dismissal by submitting a written request within 30 days. Although we did not deem your February 9, 2009 letter to be such a request, should you wish to have your complaint against those attorneys, and the Committee's decision to close it, reviewed by another Committee member in accordance with our rules, please let us know (in writing sent via regular or overnight mail). Although you may continue to contact our office by fax, we require that you mail a hard copy of any faxed material and that it be signed by you.”

Yet had Reardon read the February 09, 2009 letter I sent, it clearly states,

“Also, we are filing this letter response to not only reinvestigate the dismissal of case Docket #2008-0756, docketed for an unknown person referenced in Friedberg’s letter as the only docket for 6 of the 2008 Complaints [Emphasis Added] but to also complain that the same attorney’s continue to act in conflict at the Court of Appeals, constituting further violations of the Attorney Code of Conduct.”

Reardon’s attempts at explaining why his office did not take this as a request to appeal their conflicted and illegal dismissal timely and instead chose to bury it for 8 months is more than obvious, acts as further criminal activity in violation of the Attorney Conduct Code, the DDC Rules and Regulations and Law.

V.      Conclusion

Therefore, to Preclude further violations of law, I, Eliot I. Bernstein, make the following formal requests to your offices for action to stop this outrageous, unethical and illegal behavior by:

1.      Compelling the NYAG to immediately convene a Grand Jury to investigate the NYAG offices, the US Attorney offices, the District and Assistant District Attorney offices, the First Department and the DDC, all fingered by Anderson. 

2.      Compelling the District Attorney to immediately convene a Grand Jury to investigate the NYAG offices, the US Attorney offices, the District and Assistant District Attorney offices, the First Department and the DDC, all fingered by Anderson. 

3.      Beginning a Senate Judiciary Committee Task Force IMMEDIATELY to begin investigation and review of all those courts and court personnel who are implicated in these matters, including but not limited to:

a.       The Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department

b.      The Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee

c.       Thomas Cahill, former Chief Counsel of the DDC

d.      Sherry K. Cohen, Deputy Chief Counsel of the DDC

e.       Naomi Goldstein ~ “The Cleaner”, Deputy Chief Counsel of the DDC

f.       David Spokony, Deputy Clerk First Department

g.      Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe, Former Clerk of the First Department and current Clerk of the New York Court of Appeals Southern District

h.      Justice Angela M. Mazzarelli of the Appellate Division, First Department

4.      Forcing removal of all of my disciplinary complaints from the DDC for IMMEDIATE INVESTIGATION by NON-CONFLICTED INVESTIGATORS this time, especially where Anderson named my companies and my complaints filed with the DDC in her original federal lawsuit and I quote from Anderson’s Original Lawsuit on Page 24-25,

“96. … Upon information and belief, sources within the DDC stated that Plaintiff posed a threat of further disclosures, since Cahill and Cohen knew that Plaintiff was aware of other misconduct on their part.

97. Upon information and belief, defendants also state that the timing of the Plaintiff’s abrupt firing was connected to the newly circulated revelations concerning Cahill's status as an individually named defendant in a lawsuit entitled In the Matter of Complaints Against Attorneys and Counselors-At-Law; Kenneth Rubenstein – Docket 2003.0531; Raymond Joao – Docket 2003.0532; Steven C. Krane - Docket Pending Review By Paul J. Curran, Esq. - Thomas J. Cahill J. Cahill- Docket Pending By Special Counsel Martin R. Gold On Advisement of Paul J. Curran (Separate Motion Attached); and the Law Firm of Proskauer Rose, LLP; Eliot I. Bernstein, Pro Se and P. Stephen Lamont Both Individually and On Behalf of Shareholders of: Iviewit Corporation, et al, Petitioner. That lawsuit was filed in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division: First Department.”

Especially, where prior misconduct by DDC Officers led to Unanimous Consent by Five First Department Justices for INVESTIGATION of CONFLICTS OF INTERESTS & THE APPEARANCE OF IMPROPRIETY several years ago, revolving around these same matters, which were further BURIED and COVERED UP by CONFLICTED members of the SECOND DEPARTMENT DDC and the SECOND DEPARTMENT.

5.      Beginning investigations into the Second Department and Second Department DDC for their illegal obstructive behavior in defiance of the First Department Court Orders and beginning similar Grand Jury and Judiciary Committee Task Force actions as those stated in 1 & 2 above.

6.      Immediately suspending all First Department and Second Department Officers from handling complaints against themselves or the complaints of the legally related cases to Christine C. Anderson that legally are related by Judge Scheindlin marking them so.

7.      Immediately oversight the US Federal Court of Scheindlin to force compliance with Judicial Cannons and Law that compel that court to now notify the proper authorities of the CRIMINAL ELEMENTS of the Anderson claims and need for immediate INVESTIGATION by all applicable oversight authorities.

Please formally and in writing respond to this letter with exact language as to what your offices can do to intercede in these matters.

Respectfully Yours,
_____________________
Eliot I. Bernstein
Founder & Inventor

Iviewit Holdings, Inc. – DL
Iviewit Holdings, Inc. – DL
Iviewit Holdings, Inc. – FL
Iviewit Technologies, Inc. – DL
Uview.com, Inc. – DL
Iviewit.com, Inc. – FL
Iviewit.com, Inc. – DL
I.C., Inc. – FL
Iviewit.com LLC – DL
Iviewit LLC – DL
Iviewit Corporation – FL
Iviewit, Inc. – FL
Iviewit, Inc. – DL
Iviewit Corporation

cc/ec:

The Honorable Barack Hussein Obama II
President United States of America

The Honorable Glenn A. Fine
Inspector General United States Department of Justice

The Honorable John Conyers Jr.
Chairman House Judiciary Committee

The Honorable United States Senator Dianne Feinstein
Senate Judiciary Committee

Hon. Eric H. Holder, Jr.
United States Attorney General
US Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington, D.C. 20530-0001

The Honorable Elena Kagan
Solicitor General US Department of Justice

Robert S. Mueller, III.
Director Federal Bureau of Investigation

Candice M. Will
Assistant Director, Office of Professional Responsibility
Federal Bureau of Investigation

The Honorable Shira A. Scheindlin, United States District Court ~ Southern District of New York

The Honorable Harry I. Moatz
Director, Office of Enrollment & Discipline
United States Patent & Trademark Office

Todd J. Zinser
Inspector General United States Department of Commerce

David Kappos
Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
United States Patent & Trademark Office

John J. Doll
Commissioner for Patents United States Patent and Trademark Office

David L. Gouvaia
Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration

Mary L. Schapiro
Chairperson United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Peter L. McClintock
Acting Inspector General Small Business Administration

Chris P. Mercer
President Institute of Professional Representatives before the European Patent Office (epi)

Steven Michael Cohen
Counselor and Chief of Staff for Andrew Cuomo
New York Office of the Attorney General

Joseph M. Demarest, Jr.
FBI Assistant Director in Charge of the New York Division, 26 Federal Plaza, 23rd Floor
New York, NY 10278-0004

David A. Paterson
Governor New York State

New York Senate Judiciary Committee Members:

sampson@senate.state.ny.us, onorato@senate.state.ny.us, schneiderman@schneiderman.org, schneiderman@senate.state.ny.us, hassellt@senate.state.ny.us, diaz@senate.state.ny.us, jdklein@senate.state.ny.us, eadams@senate.state.ny.us, espada@senate.state.ny.us, breslin@senate.state.ny.us, dilan@senate.state.ny.us, savino@senate.state.ny.us, perkins@senate.state.ny.us, maziarz@senate.state.ny.us, jdefranc@senate.state.ny.us, volker@senate.state.ny.us, saland@senate.state.ny.us, lavalle@senate.state.ny.us, bonacic@senate.state.ny.us, winner@senate.state.ny.us, nozzolio@senate.state.ny.us, lanza@senate.state.ny.us, ranz@senate.state.ny.us, spotts@senate.state.ny.us.

Hon. Andrew Cuomo
Attorney General
Office of the Attorney General
The Capitol
Albany, NY 12224-0341
and
120 Broadway
New York City, NY
10271-0332 

Monica Connell, Esq.
Assistant Attorney General - Division of State Counsel Litigation Bureau, State of New York Office of the Attorney General
120 Broadway
New York City, NY
10271-0332

Thomas P. DiNapoli
Comptroller
State of New York

Robert Morris Morgenthau
District Attorney of New York County
One Hogan Place
New York, NY 10013
212-335-9000

Lovett & Bellatoni
37A Saw Mill River Road, RT 9A
Hawthorne, NY 10532

Select Press

Select Iviewit Shareholders and Patent Interest Holders

Enclosure(s)/Attachment(s)

Uniform Resource Locator(s)
            All Uniform Resource Locators ( URL ) incorporated in entirety by reference herein

cmb/eib

Iviewit Holdings, Inc./Iviewit Technologies, Inc.
2753 N.W. 34th St. Boca Raton, Florida 33434-3459
(561) 245.8588 (o) / (561) 886.7628 (c) / (561) 245-8644 (f)
iviewit@iviewit.tv - www.iviewit.tv



[7] It should be noted that the January 27, 2009 letter referenced was not to myself, Eliot Bernstein, but instead to P. Stephen Lamont who has illegally been acting as an Iviewit Technologies Officer, the CEO, of an Iviewit company located 175 King Street in Armonk New York of which no such company to the best of my knowledge ever existed.  I have previously made a Motion to Compel at the Second Circuit in my pending case regarding Lamont’s illegal behavior with the First Department in attempts to create exonerative letters through fraud in collusion with the DDC, which can be found @ http://iviewit.tv/wordpress

DMCA Copyright Owned and Counterclaimed by Roxanne Grinage manager HireLyrics Administrative Services U.S. Citizens Public Docket Database, Pennsylvania and U.S. Department of Treasury registered standard access litigation referral having verified due diligence reported herein.  All internet radio domain and video hosts are notified of Roxanne Grinage's COUNTERCLAIM WILLINGNESS TO ACCEPT SERVICE IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA AT BUSINESS ADDRESS, P.O. BOX 22225, PHILADELPHIA PA, 19136 Tel 267-444-0594 Fax 215-405-2939. 

Print

01/22/2012 Roxanne Grinage Standard Claims Intake Assessment verifies Michael Nazario his wife Joy Regina Nazario Adams their children Michael D. Nazario Jr, Yasiah Nazario, Veonna Nazario, Michael's Father in Law James Dixon Age 55, Michael Rosario's Son and Son's Fiance Isaia D Smith and Marie their 6 month old baby are Federal Crime Victims created by Measurable through Docket Analysis Official Corruption Fraud Civil Rights Crimes Judicial Tyranny in Retaliation for American Family Rosario demand their Civil Rights to Due Process - Hennepin County Minnesota and Ramsey County Sheriffs Deputies and Local Law Enforcement were abused by the Threat of False Arrest and Unlawful Imprisonment declared in open court by a corrupt Domestic Relations Judge Kathryn L. Quaintance who is documented for spearheading what the evidence gathering depositions and expert witness testimony are standard modus operandi of a Racketeering Corruption Influenced Organization (RICO) Indictable Kidnap For Profit Scheme where the following officially positioned people are culpable for measureable degrees of criminal malpractice culpability which resulted in Hennepin and Ramsey Counties Minnesota Law Enforcement being abused to cause the multiple breaking and entering home invasion guns drawn and actually pointed to a six month old baby: This audio file is available for free download and posted as a case study and a teaching segments as to how Federal Crime Victims can utilize the Collaborative powers of internet technologies to organize voter clout, gather evidence and report verified claims in Federal Pro Se Lawsuits and Dept of Justice Claim Forms and Damages Claims with the growing recognition American U.S. Economy Education and Public Safety Jobs Expansion 2012 recognize Law Enforcement are Working Class People Too and Federal Crime Victims are not complaining about amorphous unaccountabile government as much as we have verified evidence reported as due diligence to highest levels of law enforcement and U.S. Senate, special prosecutors lawmakers and funding source decision makers U.S. government accountability office as to why there is a Public Safety Intervention need in local jurisdictions where the conflict of interest nepotism and malpractice becomes the acceptable standard unable to cure or correct the corruption poisoned jurisdiction: State of Minnesota County of Hennepin District Court Juvenile Court Fourth Judicial District In the Matter of the Welfare of the Cihldren of Joy Adams aka Nazario, Parent Michael Nazario, Parent Children: Michael D Nazario Jr dob 1994, Yasiah Nazario dob 1996, Veonna Nazario dob 2000 Order For CHIPS Adjudication and Protective Supervision Fam No. 323598 Case No. 27-JV-11-7365 Presided: Kathryn L. Quaintance, Appearances (for examining and measuring conflict of interest professional misconduct malpractice or negligence) Karin L. Chedister, assistant Hennepin County Attorney, Diane Kassler, Social Worker Hennepin County Human Services and Public Health Department, Charles Clippert, attorney for mother, Allan Caplan, attorney for the father, Carrie Prentice, Assistant Hennepin County Public Defender, appeared for the child Yasiah, Colin Nelson, Alternate Public Defender, appeared for child Veonna, Todd Kenyon, Attorney for Guardian ad Litem, Denise Graves, Guardian ad Litem. This audio file is 55 minutes is an mp3 and free download. Strongest Prayers for the rescue of Kidnap For Profit injured Children of All Ages, Respectfully Roxanne Grinage, Legal Administrative Assistant Project Manager, HireLyrics Administrative Services "Prayer and a U.S. Citizens (controlled) Public Docket Database will engage slow and heal a nationwide Child Slaughter U.S. Economy Fraud Court and Education Reform Public Safety Emergency."

Free Download Re-posted 10/20/11 Build This! Roxanne Grinage 11 years Prototype Demonstrated Standard Access Practice Model Schematics Reported at Fifth Anniversary 2005 birthed Administrative Solutions Tool U.S. Citizens controlled Public Docket Database Corruption in Government Clean Up Child Slaughter U.S. Economy Fraud Court Education Reform Public Safety Emergency.pdf

11/28/10 "Intelligence Collections Analysis Methodologist Expert Witness James Roger Brown Criteria Based Definition Best Interest of Child, Legislative Language Petitions, IMMD-2 Mental Health Exam Fraud Attorney Generals Consumer Complaints compile 20,000 complaints per state million nationwide class action, Data Analysis Child Slave Project.wma"
https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B89iePTz33VFOWRlMGE3YjUtOWQ3Mi00NTJhLThhMTYtMzdkMTY5NzFiNDU2&hl=en_US

071411 Roxanne Grinage HireLyrics Standard Access Claims Intake Assessment Pennsylvania Philadelphia Family Court Appointed Lawyer Lies About Grandparents Standing Facilitate 112th DHS Demonic Horror Story Kidnap Injuries Four Generations Thomas Family Ada Janette Gladys Janaya Victoria Jermya Ikee Thomas.wma https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B89iePTz33VFMmQ0YzYxOWQtZjk3Zi00MzRmLTkzZGEtODUwODJhM2VmZDA5&hl=en_US

052911 Roxanne Grinage Explains Administrative Solutions in U.S. Citizens controlled Public Docket Database For Law Abiding American Federal Crime Victims of Family Court with DHS Kidnap For Profit Schemes evolved because of the official corruption fraud civil rights crimes which occurred in Roxanne Grinage v Fern Brown Caplan, Esquire, Timothy E. Possenti, Esquire and Brownson Ezekiel Brown and Arriyel Brown v Judge Robert J Matthews and Anne Marie Ambrose in their individual criminal capacities for having stolen $6.2 Million Vested Interest Career Theft from Roxanne Grinage dba HireLyrics Administrative Services and Ezekiel and Arriyel Brown and Lorraine Grinage v Erick Brown and Saundra Sullivan 121310 Aggravated Assaults on minors while in the commission of SSI Fraud Insurance Fraud Bigamy Perjery and 060810 Public Mob Assault Child Abductions of Lorraine Grinage’s children while fleeing services of Federal and Philadelphia District Attorney Services of Summons, USDC PaED 209cv04119MSG 209cv05448BMS 209cv00179MSG.wma  https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B89iePTz33VFMzI4NDg2OTctNjVlZS00Y2I4LWJjYTQtNzkzYjc2NDNmNzdi&hl=en_US  

053111 Special Prosecutor Intervention Audit Review Requested 070610 Filing Figure 1 Docket Discrimination Analysis U.S.D.C. Paed 209cv04119MSG Roxanne Grinage v Fern Brown Caplan Esquire et al.doc (289 KB) 7:21 am by HireLyrics Download

052711 SCHEDULE C U.S. Citizens controlled Public Docket Citizens Video Journalism Public Post Incident Reports HireLyrics Administrative Services Roxanne Grinage Family Rescue Ezekiel Arriyel Brown.doc (2 MB) 4:53 pm by HireLyrics.org Download

021311 IRS PACSES USM285 USDOA USDC Notices Grinage Family Rescue Ezekiel Arriyel Brown Philadelphia Family Court DHS Malpractice Judge Robert Matthews Kevin Dougherty Anne Ambrose Erick Brown 060810 Mob Assault Abduction Fraud.pdf

012311 Confidential Distribution List Redacted Roxanne Grinage HireLyrics Checklist Proposal Management Team Invitations First Draft Business Plan Nonprofit Federal Crime Victim Voters Safe Haven DHS Abused Runaways.pdf

DMCA Copyrights Owned by Roxanne Grinage. Pics and audio being formatted for upload coming soon. Federal Crime Victim Voters Education Rallies and April 1st Bullhorns Neighborhoods Citizens Campaigns Ensure No Second Term Michael Nutter's DHS Courtroom Killing Floors.

053111 Special Prosecutor Intervention Audit Review Requested 070610 Filing Figure 1 Docket Discrimination Analysis U.S.D.C. Paed 209cv04119MSG Roxanne Grinage v Fern Brown Caplan Esquire et al.doc (289 KB) 7:21 am by HireLyrics Download

052711 SCHEDULE C U.S. Citizens controlled Public Docket Citizens Video Journalism Public Post Incident Reports HireLyrics Administrative Services Roxanne Grinage Family Rescue Ezekiel Arriyel Brown.doc (2 MB) 4:53 pm by HireLyrics.org Download

010211 Free Sign Up Form Roxanne Grinage HireLyrics Toll Free 888-589-1110 $1 Billion Class Action Campaign 2012 Galvanize Voter Clout Federal Crime Victims Pa Constitution Citizens Grand Juries Safe Haven DHS Court Abused Runaways.pdf

Print fill in and fax back the second page of this pdf file if you want us to contact you to verify your claim to join class action lawsuit 70 families and growing plan to sue City of Philadelphia DHS and certain Philadelphia Family Court Judges with Certain Named City Solicitors Child Advocates Commissioner Case Workers. See Roxanne Grinage HireLyrics Mar 15 2011 Metro Philly Ad. Fax completed form back to 215-405-2939. Leave your victim testimony on toll free number only (888) 589-1110. Contact RoxanneGrinage@Yahoo.com if you can by email. The name of this pdf document in case you are searching online is See Roxanne Grinage HireLyrics Mar 15 2011 Metro Philadelphia Newspaper Ad Fax Free Form 215-405-2939 Call 888-589-1110 Join 70 Families Plan $1 Billion Lawsuit No 2nd Term Nutter DHS Family Courtroom Killing Floors Must Close.pdf

http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-564973 See Full Length 33min video what happened 02/28/2011 when New Civil Rights Movement New Civil Rights Heroes Families Fight Back Say No More DHS Demonic Horror Stories, Janice Brown, Maurice West, Roxanne Grinage reviewed the records ordered produced by Subpoena upon DHS City of Philadelphia Deputy Solicitor Barbara A. Ash – an historic event in turning the tide for a so far unaccountable Philadelphia Family Court with DHS agency daily kidnap for profit child slaughter, theft of heritage, religious freedoms, forced commerce, siphoned embezzled federal and state funds by deliberate or  incompetent falsification of records and lying in official court documents:  Child Abuse Registry Fraud; Child Support Enforcement Fraud; Mental Health Exam Fraud; unlawful attachments, double and triple billing, etc. at CNN iReport HireLyrics Roxanne Grinage http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-564973

A management team of Federal Crime Victim Voters created by State Court Conflict of Interest with DHS malpractice will organize the endorsement and impeachment clout of a tragically far too large voter constituency while we create jobs in our community that do what our elected officials have failed to do – protect public safety, educate, make referrals to ethical litigators and claims processes; transmit Fraud Reports and Recovery Act Fraud and Waste Whistleblower transmittals; honor our Commonwealth, States’ and U.S. Constitutions; and provide constitutionally correct People’s Protection Safe Haven for DHS and Court Ordered Abused Runaways.  I commit every resource I have including ten and half years demonstrated standard access mechanism Roxanne Grinage dba HireLyrics Administrative Services to the rescue of my grand children which I believe hinges on DHS slaughtered families ceasing to be reactive (the nature of a DHS Demonic Horror Story Assault is to Disorient Confuse and Dismay); determine and navigate our own course; fuel our own momentum; speak and show up in tragically large one body one voice – millions slaughtered.  Because my family’s salvation rests in recognizing those with a common purpose passion commitment and ability, I believe in my vision that a personality independent standard access to fair entry into competitive processes, i.e., the New Civil Rights Movement fight for human lives; U.S. and Commonwealths and States’ economy is needed to amplify the voice of the systematically silently slaughtered victim American family. If one of us should fall, or ten of us should fall or a hundred of us should fall…we WILL have a community-needs powered personality independent mechanism in place that will repetitively trigger  standard access to the rescue of children of all ages injured by the child selling schemes of official corruption fraud civil rights felonies inflicted.

03/28/11 Donations needed All Neighbors and Community Welcome Meeting Place where anyone can come regardless of who you know or what you have, share learning, network solutions for rescuing the soul of our cities, our commonwealths, our nation:  Federal Crime Victim Voters Safe Haven DHS Abused Runaways.  No Second Term Michael Nutter Daily DHS Philadelphia Family Court Child Slaughter Must End.  Purchase a Tee Shirt Donations pay for Metro Philly Daily News Philadelphia Inquirer Print Ads, Television and Radio Ads, Donation Buttons at www.HireLyrics.org

Administrative Costs for maintaining a place where anyone is welcome no matter who you know or what you have to share learning network strategize lawful solutions for slowing Child Slaughter U.S. Economy Fraud Court and Education Reform Emergency while we rescue the soul of our Cities, Our Commonwealths, Our States, Our Nation.  https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B_UmvYpq4WCUNjlmZGM0MjctNWNhMi00YWFiLTk5MjgtMDRkNTQ1ZDhjYjI1&hl=en  

See Too Many Pics and iGoogle document links to fit here and complete blog posts http://HireLyrics.org.  Roxanne Grinage Hosts HireLyrics is Born To Serve on Blog Talk Radio where we meet Sundays at 11:00 A.M. EST to share administrative solutions for market entry challenges for the previously un-accommodated population of disadvantaged creators. http://BlogTalkRadio.com/Born-To-Serve.  Leave your verifiable testimony about your Family Court with DHS Malpractice inflicted crimes against your American family toll free (888) 589-1110.  Fax your documents to (215) 239-1110.  Roxanne Grinage will verify and play on HireLyrics is Born To Serve on Blog Talk Radio whose show urls are submitted to the official contact forms of USDOJ, Whitehouse, Lawmakers, Prosecutors, Funding Sources, Media and ethical people who are in a position to intervene and help slow U.S. Citizens Public Docket responsibly recorded respectfully reported Child Slaughter U.S. Economy Court and Education Reform State of Emergency.

Roxanne Grinage Respectfully Suggested Administrative Solutions
Child Slaughter U.S. Economy Fraud Court and Education Reform State of Emergency

The answer to missed educational opportunities; oppressive contracts and unaccountability horror stories; racism; poverty; and hate-based ideas festering into terrorism, is the responsible development of entities that standardize access, standardize procedures, and standardize services.  Respectfully, -roxanne grinage-

“Take no bag for the journey, or extra tunic or sandals or a staff; for the worker is worth his keep.”
Matthew 10:10

 

Roxanne Grinage, HireLyrics Administrative Services, U.S. Citizens (controlled) Public Docket Database, Grinage Family Rescue Ezekiel Arriyel Brown
PO Box 22225, Philadelphia PA 19136

Toll Free (888) 589-1110                   Fax:  (215) 589-2939
Email:  RoxanneGrinage@Yahoo.com and/or DignityForTheHumanSpirit@HireLyrics.org
http://Facebook.com/Roxanne.Grinage            http://Twitter.com/HireLyrics
http://YouTube.com/HireLyrics           http://YouTube.com/WhatIsThereLeftToDo
http://YouTube.com/RoxanneGrinage

HireLyrics™ is a litigation referral administrative services company that raises quality of life by providing standard access to those administrative services that when rendered contingently cause fair entry into competitive processes; exposure and earnings opportunities for the previously unseen, unmeasured un-accommodated Worldwide Population of Disadvantaged Creators©. What are Disadvantaged Creators© Creating?....Work Product and Career Contributions, Families, Communities, Education, Technology, Entertainment, Engineering, Military and Defense, Health care Medicine and Science, Twelve Step Recovery, Life Experience and Mentorship, etc.

 

What is Done in The Dark is Coming to Light as Sun Shines on a darkened gloomy Philadelphia City Hall.jpg What is done in the dark will come to light.  Federal Investigation, choking funding Corruption Plagued PHA clean up, DHS slaughtered families speaking in one voice millions slaughter using lawful evidence gathering depositions and expert witness testimony to document Kidnap For Profit schemes of Judge Kevin M Dougherty who told Janice Brown “I’m concerned about how much loss of family members you have suffered” and then proceeded to work with DHS City Solicitors Lyris Younge and Barbara A Ash to falsify records to cause infliction of further suffering illegal adoption kidnap for profit trauma theft of heritage religious freedoms and possible forced chemicals injuries inflicted on Envy Smith and Zyeem Hill, Janice Brown’s grandchildren.  https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B_UmvYpq4WCUMjhjNTU3YWYtZjAzOC00MThmLTg4MjItNTIyY2NmYmQyYTNi&hl=en  

030111 Roxanne Grinage HireLyrics Fifty Families Sign Up $1B Class Action No 2nd Term Michael Nutter Philadelphia Family Courtroom Killings Floors Must Close.gif
https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B_UmvYpq4WCUNGNkZjliNTgtOTI0Ni00Y2M3LWEwZDAtNGMzMWRhNjVhZjJk&hl=en  

030111 Roxanne Grinage HireLyrics US Citizens Public Docket Administrative Solutions slow Child Slaughter US Economy Court Education Reform Emergency.jpg.gif (89 KB)
https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B_UmvYpq4WCUZWE3YjdmN2ItY2M2OS00NWUyLWIwMTEtMTFlNTVjZDllMDZj&hl=en  

022811 Janice Brown Feltonville Crash Grandmother receives threat of DHS Retaliation to Remove remaining grandchild for proving DHS City of Philadelphia City Solicitors Lyris Younge, Barbara A. Ash, Judge Kevin M. Dougherty’s illegal adoptions for profit schemes by way of Deliberate Records Mis-Management.  Janice Brown, Maurice West, Deborah Young and Roxanne Grinage did place in the hands of Barbara A. Ash, Deputy City Solictor signed witness statements re Subpoenaed Records Reviewed the following:  Barbara Ash has been left with Notice of Fifty Families $1 Billion Class Action Personal Injuries inflicted by DHS with Philadelphia Family Court.  02/28/2011.  This notifies [that] Janice Brown Maurice West Deborah Young Roxanne Grinage did come in person to DHS 1515 Arch and did confirm in person conversation with Barbara Ash, Chief Deputy City Solicitor (1) Barbara Ash did not produce records pertaining to Envy Smith and Zyeem Hill; (2) Did not produce any Deposition Petition or reason(s) for transport transfer guardianship and (3) Barbara Ash did produce falsified records / old case notes altered to appear as recently entered false statements unsbstantiated.  No record was produced to support transport, or adoption of Janice Browns grandchildren.  Signed Janice Brown, Signed Maurice West, Signed Deborah Young, Signed Roxanne Grinage.  DHS Records Mismanagement Error noted at time of paying for and picking up 55 pages copied by DHS employee was that another family another DHS case number completely unrelated to Janice Brown Envy Smith Zyeem Hill Subpoenaed Records incompletely produced - indicated on City of Philadelphia DHS Letterhead Responsible Management showing Raydell Fisher-Wilson, Legal Assistant Supervisor Law Department Child Welfare Unit, One Parkway Building, 1515 Arch Street, 16th Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19102-1595, (215) 683-5158 Fax (215) 683-5162 RAYDELLFISHER@PHILA.GOV did present receipt with reinforced theft of heritage separation trauma injuries suffered by Janice Brown's grandchildren for 3 and 1/2 years by inserted false record Re: DHS Case Name: Smith Robert, DHS File No. 183646D.  https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=explorer&chrome=true&srcid=0B_UmvYpq4WCUYTRjYWY4OWEtYzFjNS00NmIzLTg4NDAtNmYyYzFkODU3ZTE0&hl=en  

022811 City Philadelphia DHS time cards Time clock seen in reception area records review – It’s a job – what length will unethical people go to keep a job?.jpg  https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B_UmvYpq4WCUN2I1YTM2ODYtY2FhMi00MDc0LTgwYTAtM2Y4ZWY0MmIyM2M3&hl=en  

022811 DHS Records mis-management kidnapped for profit stolen heritage stolen futures theft of religious freedoms DHS People Lives piled up scattered on the Floor like garbage 1 of 3.jpg  https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B_UmvYpq4WCUYjhlY2FmZGUtZTAyZi00MGEzLTlhMzMtOTdlZjUyN2ViZDFl&hl=en  

022811 Records mis-management kidnapped for profit stolen heritage DHS Files People Lives Scattered on the Floor like garbage 2 of 3.jpg  https://docs.google.com https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B_UmvYpq4WCUZDcyNzFiYWItNmU1Yi00NTFhLWE2NzQtMGI1MTE4NzBhN2Zm&hl=en

022811 DHS kidnap for profit heritage futures religious freedoms stolen stacked in boxes stored and forgotten 3 of 3.jpg 
https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B_UmvYpq4WCUYTk5ZWRlMDctZWE4ZC00M2FhLThkZDMtNzAyNGZiNDQ0YTk0&hl=en

022811 Deborah Young notes incomplete misfiled records in front of Maurice West points out dust laden law books never opened by DHS.jpg  https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B_UmvYpq4WCUMmJkOGRjMmUtOWQyYS00YTY2LWE5M2YtZTliZDU4NThiMTQ1&hl=en  

022811 gif Federal Crime Victim Voters Created by DHS Slaugher Vote Sign Up 1 Billion Class Action.gif (1 MB)9:20 https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B_UmvYpq4WCUZGU4ZDNkZDMtZGMyOS00OTRlLTk4NTctYTc0N2ZkYjkxNjY4&hl=en  

022811 Janice Brown Deborah Young recognize DHS falsified records and records of other families not related in her file and incomplete records produced by DHS City Solicitor subpoenaed Barbara A. Ash no deposition petition whatsoever.jpg https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B_UmvYpq4WCUOTYxNjYyZjEtOGM2Mi00Y2UzLWJjNGQtNWExNWVjYzM0YjNl&hl=en

Deborah Young Maurice West Janice Brown 1 Billion Class Action Statement on way DHS Subpoenaed Records Review illegal adoption.jpg (126 KB)
https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B_UmvYpq4WCUZmRjZjk0MzctYjc0NS00MTE5LWE1NjktNjIxMDgwN2M3NjI4&hl=en   

See how families are using docket monitoring and lawful policies and procedures of Federal Agencies to prove Judge Kevin M. Dougherty’s willful participation in defrauding Pennsylvania and Philadelphia Child Support Enforcement and Recovery Act CPS funding. 

021311 IRS PACSES USM285 USDOA USDC Notices Grinage Family Rescue Ezekiel Arriyel Brown Philadelphia Family Court DHS Malpractice Judge Robert Matthews Kevin Dougherty Anne Ambrose Erick Brown 060810 Mob Assault Abduction Fraud.pdf https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=explorer&chrome=true&srcid=0B_UmvYpq4WCUODdkMzVlYmMtZTIyYS00MGZjLTk3NjMtZTMzMDc4ZjEwYjFl&hl=en

12/12/2009 Grinage Family Rescue Ezekiel Arriyel Brown will never forget the Laurel and Hardy Whose on First What’s on Second Anne Marie Ambrose Lied about in 18 page email stating DHS workers responded to the recorded bragged about by Saundra O. Sullivan beatings of Ezekiel Zadkiel Brown, Cracking Sounds, threats “yeah I’m hitting them now bitch what you going to do about It?” the screams of Ezekiel and Arriyel’s non stop crying heard in the background over 7 hours.  And then Anne Marie Ambrose’s censoring as though never received by DHS the 10/08/09 IMMD social worker Jacinta Garrison’s delivered proofs Sergeant read outloud high levels of cocaine speed and pcp drug test submitted by Timothy Possenti to Fern Brown Caplan to cause the 13 felonies inflicted Willful Reckless Child Endangerment of Roxanne Grinage’s grandchildren for the sake of greed extortion and bribes proven.  https://docs.google.com/fileview?id=0BwkY4FQWX-6pZGQ5NWIyYWEtZWFkMi00OGZhLWIwNzItN2QzNzJlMGJkYzYz&hl

Shoulder to Shoulder Deborah Young Janice Brown Maurice West Lead Way Fifty Families want to see records of stolen heritage DHS 1 Billion Class Action 22811.jpg (56 KB
https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B_UmvYpq4WCUNjNhMWMwZTAtNTY5YS00OTA2LWIzYTQtNDNjNzA5NDY3YmI1&hl=en  

022711 Charles Stecker Jr commemorates 44th anniversary death 2 year old Edward J. Stecker Murdered the Philadelphia DHS foster contractor who was trusted to help.  Edward Stecker was two years old and found out a Philadelphia Inquirer Article reported the same woman that murdered his two year old brother and shatter Edward's 4 year old arm was in fact under investigation for another child having died ten months before in the same foster "mother's" house: reformatted for TK official DC Rally Fest.gif (134 KB)
https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B_UmvYpq4WCUNjUwZGFkOGEtZTRiZi00ZTE2LTkwOWYtZDE5OGVhYmU2Yjhi&hl=en  

Print

Print

Roxanne Grinage
PO Box 22225, Philadelphia Pa 19136
Direct Dial Cell (267) 444-0594      Fax:  (215) 405-2939
roxannegrinage@yahoo.com
www.HireLyrics.org
        www.Facebook.com/Roxanne.Grinage
www.Twitter.com/HireLyrics
                    www.YouTube.com/HireLyrics
www.BlogTalkRadio.com/Born-To-Serve


Re:  Expressing interest in administrative support / staff employment

 

WHO I AM.       I am a community conscience baby boomer who constantly applies ingenuity and passion to make this world a better place.   I possess more than 20 years experience as both an employee and self employed consultant legal administrative assistant, human resources assistant, executive assistant loyally adept in providing administrative, document production, marketing, careers and due diligence reporting support to large mid-size sole practitioner law firms, staffing firms, investment banking mergers and acquisitions and, what I am most proud of… administrative solutions for market entry challenges of American working class student and impoverished families victimized by official corruption fraud civil rights violations.

 

June 2000, I started my own self employment interest which Wharton Small Business Administration nominated in 2001 for Philadelphia 100 recognition as an invention in business method.  My administrative assistant support skills and exemplary work ethic were honed working for attorneys, analysts and executives at firms like Wolf Block, Dechert, Blank Rome, Buchanan Ingersoll, Legg Mason Wood Walker, Citicorp U.S. Cards Products, Nynex Governances and Securities, Coopers & Lybrand Tax Department and CDI Staffing giants CDI Engineering and CDI Information Technology Divisions. 

 

I was fortunate because I received a whole lot of guidance from a few attorneys I was working for as a second shift secretary floater at Blank Rome, Wharton MBA students and even a Wharton board member, founder of Encore Books Zainy Brainy Stores and co-founder eBay and Half.com with regard to understanding Overview and Rationale, depicting and demonstrating envisioned evolving practice models for what in my mind was an obvious working scale model prototype demonstration that standard access to standard services which utilized free and low cost internet networking capabilities would unlock economy enriching revenue in an a previously untapped population of litigants ─ if the disadvantaged claimant could access research, legal secretarial, document production, marketing and careers services regardless of who they knew or what the claimant had.

 

2003 – 2007 I, as manager of Pennsylvania Secretary of State and U.S. Department of Treasury registered sole proprietorship earned Womens Minority Business Enterprise expert certifications in nine areas of administrative practice:  Legal services including evidence gathering, depositions and expert witness testimony; employment generating activities; employee development; careers consulting; employee assistance programs; tax preparation and advisory services; and image consulting.

 

WHAT I DID.  August 2009 to Present.  I knew about and chose to embrace problem solving challenges faced by American working class student and impoverished families and entrepreneurs as a liquid demographic whose economic impacts have measureable characteristics flowing throughout every profession, race, gender, religion, region, age, lifestyle; and whose untapped claims for damages, personal injury, wrongful death, forced commerce, theft and irreparable harms are felt generationally as a nationwide Child Slaughter, U.S. Economy Fraud, Court and Education Reform Public Safety Emergency.

 

Even before my own official corruption fraud civil rights victimization recorded in Roxanne Grinage v Fern Brown Caplan, Esquire, et al, U.S.D.C. 209-cv-04119-MSG,  I constantly learned and applied technology and protocols necessary to guard integrity of document production as evidence gathering depositions and expert witness testimony for what HireLyrics’ earliest invention of business method practice model schematics referred to as “raised quality of life by providing fair and holistic entry to exposure and earnings opportunities for the previously unseen unmeasured un-accommodated Worldwide Population of Disadvantaged Creators© of original creative work products.” 

 

I am proud that when faced with being blackballed for employment by some of the corrupt lawyers and judges whose RICO and Title 18 indictable crimes my administrative solutions tools exposed for deliberate malpractice ─ I chose to parlay a potentially life destroying challenge into an opportunity to demonstrate free and low cost standard access to legal administrative assistant services for a financially devastated population of internet presenting official corruption fraud civil rights claimants.

 

I am proud of my document production work; forms designed to accommodate standard access to claims intake assessment regardless of who the presenting claimant knows or what the presenting claimant has.  I customize existing templates and create new forms templates to identify characteristics of similarly situated classes of claimants; perform docket analysis for measuring individual accountability for official corruption fraud civil rights, Title 18 and RICO culpability, and for gauging specialized voter constituency endorsement and impeachment clout. 

 

I have produced pro se parties-filed documents, marked exhibits and exhibits summation of complaints, summons, subpoenas, notice of appeal, answers, new matters, counterclaims, motions, motions court correct administrative errors, grandparent motions to intervene, objections, affidavits, declarations and disclosures, filed by pro se parties in Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas Family Division, Pennsylvania Superior Court, U.S.D.C. Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Third Circuit Court of Appeals, Michigan Washtenaw County Juvenile Trial Court, Cowlitz County Superior Court Washington, Alaska Superior Court at Palmer CINA; and many others examples of my work can be seen and downloaded free at http://hirelyrics.org/roxannegrinageresume.html. 

 

Another administrative solution tool I am proud of is working to measure work ethic synergy and intent; identify and measure individual accountability, conflict of interest, negligence or malpractice, registered with Pennsylvania Secretary of State, is U.S. Citizens (controlled) Public Docket Database whose prototype demonstration of certified service distribution (Letter Notice) reporting of Fraud Reports Whistleblower Transmittals Intervention and Audit Requests, case studies are viewable at www.HireLyrics.org.

 

I am most proud of my demonstrated administrative solutions case studies series, “Docket Never Lies!...Child Slaughter U.S. Economy Fraud Court and Education Reform Public Safety Emergency Is Measured in Docket Analysis”, began when I utilized the database features of rows columns and tables learned when I was employed as a document production specialist by firms like Wolf Block, Dechert, Blank Rome, Buchanan Ingersoll, Legg Mason Wood Walker, Citicorp U.S. Cards Products, Nynex Governances and Securities, Coopers & Lybrand Tax Department and CDI Staffing giants CDI Engineering and CDI Information Technology Divisions.

 

WHAT I’M LOOKING FOR. Effective November 15, 2011.  I am looking for a long term or permanent “home” with an employer whose mission is to deliver best quality products and services; like myself, committed to being part of America’s quality of life enhancing solutions in economy, education, litigation, environmental protection, and public safety.  I am seeking to be taken seriously as a competitive but manageable employee who is loyal to her employers’ confidentiality, non-compete, conflict of interest considerations.

 

I was reminded there are many integrity and ethics driven practices, groups, organizations and companies who also offer compensable employment opportunities, as I performed consultant proprietary research and authored strategy planning pitch book presentation for one of the Iviewit Technologies Inventors, Eliot Ivan Bernstein. 

Assessment of market-entry challenge started with a need to galvanize legal industry scholars for moving forward stalled $1 Trillion Patent Theft and RICO claims and grew to a recognition of a three prong marketing initiative, generational community development career paths growing in academia, litigation, public safety, environmental protection, technology, economy, court reform and constitutional law enforcement.

 

The pitch book presentation is forty pages, titled 11/11/11 Roxanne Grinage HireLyrics respectfully suggested administrative solutions Build This Schematics Iviewit Technologies Fight For The Grail Births EIBCSB Estate Heirs Community Generational Career Paths Growing.pdf and can be viewed by typing any combination of these words into internet search engines, now published by at least one investigative journalist in addition to being published with other examples of Roxanne Grinage’s work at http://hirelyrics.org/roxannegrinageresume.html.

On November 14, 2011 I verified by standard access claims intake assessment the 1,060th Federal Crime Victim with verifiable evidence of official corruption fraud civil rights claims; a resident of Anchorage, Alaska, having official corruption fraud civil rights claims spanning Hawaii, military and Olympia, Washington jurisdictional challenges.

 

While “make this world a better place” work continues to be my objective, my daughter’s official birth announcement of my grandson, Grayson’s arrival in December, 2011, requires me to insist my work product contribution be reciprocated with dependable regular paid compensation so that I honor my new grandchild’s brother and sister Ezekiel Zadkiel Brown and Arriyel Roxanne Brown who were abducted on June 8, 2010 by a public mob assault led by their father Erick Brown and his girlfriend Saundra O Sullivan’s family, now federal and municipal fugitives harbored by nepotism corruption of a few City of Philadelphia elected officials.

 

One part of me is regretful but other parts of me are exhilarated looking forward to unknown challenges and accomplishments promised by my accepting that I can no longer afford to provide free professional services no matter how worthy the need. 

 

I am eternally grateful to the 1,060 Federal Crime Victim Claimants who allowed me to demonstrate standard access to legal administrative assistant video talk radio citizen journalism administrative solutions for healing a nationwide Child Slaughter U.S. Economy Fraud Court and Education Reform Public Safety Emergency.

For this expression of interest, I have attached my short form resume.  Full Chronological listing with references and direct contacts of prior employers is nine pages and will be promptly provided upon request.  Please contact me if you have interest. 

Sincerely,

/s/
Roxanne Grinage

Roxanne Grinage
PO Box 22225, Philadelphia Pa 19136
Direct Dial Cell (267) 444-0594    roxannegrinage@yahoo.com

Objective:         An accomplished and twenty years qualified professional with strong knowledge of legal services evidence gathering case study internet marketing and whistle blower reporting principles seeking a position in an organization to utilize my skills and passion for the field of corruption in government clean up initiatives or any of the administrative support practice areas for which I am 2003 through 2007 Pennsylvania Bureau of Contracts Administration Minority Women Business Enterprise certified expert: Legal Services including evidence gathering depositions and expert witness testimony; employment generating activities, employee development and career consulting, employment assistance programs, tax preparation and tax advisory services, image consulting.


June 23, 2000 to Present.  HireLyrics Administrative Services:  Owner and manager of an eleven plus years Pennsylvania Secretary of State and U.S. Department of Treasury registered Wharton Small Business Administration recognized invention of business method, HireLyrics Administrative Services, whose internet marketing careers label stores practice models demonstrate “The answer to missed educational opportunities, oppressive contracts, un-accountability horror stories, racism, poverty and hate-based ideas festering into terrorism is the responsible development of entities that standardize access and standardize services.” 


Demonstrated Core Competencies:

·         Excellent Administration Skills;

·         Competitive responsiveness to employer or client expressed objectives;

·         Strategy Planning and Presentation;

·         Excellent Leadership and Managerial Skills;

·         Proprietary Research.  Claims Intake Assessment;

·         Compliance with client or employer expressed confidentiality, non-compete preferences;

·         Identify record track and report synergetic and conflict of interest relationships;

·         Forms Design and Forms Compliance;

·         Client Matter File Creation, Time Entry, Billing, Invoices, Scanning, File Management;

·         Pro Se Court Rules Compliant Document Production;

·         Certified Services Distribution of Fraud Reports, Whistleblower Transmittals, Intervention and Audit Request by due diligence pitch book presentation or Letter Notice to U.S. Senate Committees, U.S. Dept of Justice, President Executive Officers, U.S. Courts Administration, States legislators, lawmakers, special prosecutors and funding source decision makers;

·         Records Management and Case Study Analysis;

·         Trial Prep, Discovery, Exhibits Index, Exhibits Summations, Exhibits Binders;;

·         PowerPoint to JPEG or GIF Graphic Depiction of any Process or Goal Model

·         Overview and Rationale “Best Pitch Proposal” Reports;

·         Public Relations and Promotional Writing;

·         Website and ecommerce management (using templates and a little html);

·         Video Citizens Journalism, Blog Writer, Internet Talk Radio Show Host;

·         Applications and comfortable learning new technology:  Microsoft Office Word PowerPoint Excel, Outlook, GroupWise and other internal email programs; WordPerfect; iManage, PC World Docs, Pro Law, Soft Scan, Dragon Naturally Speaking Premium Speech to Text; Styles, Numbering Schemes, Document conversion, blackline/redline track mark changes; Typing 70wpm accurate; Speedwriting 70wpm; Dictaphone tape and digital databank dictation transcription.

Organized and self-initiated; work with minimum supervision.  Also a real team player, always offer help as needed to any of my co-workers: telephone coverage, meeting and conference room facilitation, photocopies, whatever is needed.